Surgeon agreement at the time of handover, a prospective cohort study

Richard Hilsden; Bradley Moffat; Sarah Knowles; Neil Parry; Ken Leslie

doi:10.1186/s13017-016-0065-6

Surgeon agreement at the time of handover, a prospective cohort study

World J Emerg Surg. 2016 Feb 24:11:11. doi: 10.1186/s13017-016-0065-6. eCollection 2016.

Authors

Richard Hilsden¹, Bradley Moffat¹, Sarah Knowles¹, Neil Parry², Ken Leslie³

Affiliations

¹ Department of Surgery, University of Western Ontario, London Health Sciences Centre, University Hospital, 339 Windermere Road, P.O. Box 5339, London, ON N6A 5A5 Canada ; Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, ON Canada.
² Department of Surgery, University of Western Ontario, London Health Sciences Centre, University Hospital, 339 Windermere Road, P.O. Box 5339, London, ON N6A 5A5 Canada ; Department of Critical Care, London, On Canada.
³ Department of Surgery, University of Western Ontario, London Health Sciences Centre, University Hospital, 339 Windermere Road, P.O. Box 5339, London, ON N6A 5A5 Canada.

Abstract

Background: Acute Care Surgical Teams are responsible for emergent surgical patients, and as such require regular handover and coordination between different surgeons. Despite the recent emergence of this model of care, minimal research has been conducted on the quality of patient handover and no research has attempted to determine the rate of clinical agreement or disagreement among surgeons participating in these teams.

Methods: A prospective cohort study was carried out with our acute care surgical service at a tertiary care teaching hospital from January 2 to March 31 2012. At the conclusion of the daily morning handover, receiving surgeons were asked to indicate, on provided handover sheets, whether they agreed with the proposed management plan for each patient that was discussed. The specific aspects of care over which they disagreed were also described, and disagreements were classified a priori as major or minor. The primary outcome was the rate of disagreement over the handed over management plan.

Results: Six staff surgeons agreed to participate and a total of 417 unique patients were handed over during the study period. For the primary outcome, a total of 41 disagreements were recorded for a disagreement rate of 9.8 %. 15 of the 41 disagreements were classified as major, for a major disagreement rate of 3.6 %. Consultant to consultant disagreements were classified as major disagreements 63 % of the time, whereas consultant to resident disagreements were classified as major 31 % of the time (P = 0.217). On average, the age of patients for which a clinical disagreement occurred were older; 63 vs. 57 (P < 0.05).

Conclusions: Despite the frequency of handovers in clinical practice, little research has been conducted to determine the rate of disagreement over patient management among surgeons participating working in academic centers. This study demonstrated that the rate of clinical disagreement is low among surgeons working in an tertiary care teaching hospital.

Keywords: Acute care surgery; Handover; Patient safety.