Assessing the Role of Livestock in Big Cat Prey Choice Using Spatiotemporal Availability Patterns

PLoS One. 2016 Apr 11;11(4):e0153439. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0153439. eCollection 2016.

Abstract

Livestock is represented in big cat diets throughout the world. Husbandry approaches aim to reduce depredation, which may influence patterns of prey choice, but whether felids have a preference for livestock or not often remains unclear as most studies ignore livestock availability. We assessed prey choice of the endangered Persian leopard (Panthera pardus saxicolor) in Golestan National Park, Iran, where conflict over livestock depredation occurs. We analyzed leopard diet (77 scats) and assessed wild and domestic prey abundance by line transect sampling (186 km), camera-trapping (2777 camera days), double-observer point-counts (64 scans) and questionnaire surveys (136 respondents). Based on interviews with 18 shepherds, we estimated monthly grazing time outside six villages with 96 conflict cases to obtain a small livestock (domestic sheep and goat) availability coefficient. Using this coefficient, which ranged between 0.40 and 0.63 for different villages, we estimated the numbers of sheep and goats available to leopard depredation. Leopard diet consisted mainly of wild boar (Sus scrofa) (50.2% biomass consumed), but bezoar goat (Capra aegagrus) was the most preferred prey species (Ij = 0.73), whereas sheep and goats were avoided (Ij = -0.54). When absolute sheep and goat numbers (~11250) were used instead of the corrected ones (~6392), avoidance of small livestock appeared to be even stronger (Ij = -0.71). We suggest that future assessments of livestock choice by felids should incorporate such case-specific corrections for spatiotemporal patterns of availability, which may vary with husbandry methods. Such an approach increases our understanding of human-felid conflict dynamics and the role of livestock in felid diets.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Animals
  • Animals, Domestic
  • Biomass
  • Cats
  • Choice Behavior*
  • Conservation of Natural Resources / statistics & numerical data
  • Diet*
  • Ecosystem*
  • Goats
  • Humans
  • Iran
  • Male
  • Panthera / physiology*
  • Predatory Behavior*
  • Sheep
  • Sus scrofa

Grants and funding

AG was supported by German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD; https://www.daad.de, project No. 91540556) and Panthera Kaplan Graduate Awards (http://www.panthera.org/). Erasmus Mundus/SALAM (http://portal.uw.edu.pl/en/web/salam/, project No. 2013-2437-001-001-EMA2) supports MS and IK receives funding from Alexander von Humboldt Foundation (http://www.humboldt-foundation.de/, project No. 1151598). Mohammed bin Zayed Species Conservation Fund supported IK & MS in collection of conflict data from study villages (http://www.speciesconservation.org/, project No. 12255025). This publication was supported financially by the Open Access Grant Program of the German Research Foundation (DFG) and the Open Access Publication Fund of the University of Göttingen. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.