The reliability of measuring wound undermining in people with spinal cord injury

Spinal Cord. 2017 Mar;55(3):304-306. doi: 10.1038/sc.2016.108. Epub 2016 Jul 12.

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this study was to determine the reliability of measuring wound undermining in people with spinal cord injury (SCI).

Study design: A psychometric study.

Setting: The study was conducted at the Indian Spinal Injuries Centre, New Delhi, India.

Participants: Thirty people with a complete or incomplete SCI and a pressure ulcer with wound undermining were recruited.

Methods: Wound undermining was measured using the four cardinal points from a clock face (with 12 O'clock defined as towards the head). Inter-rater reliability was tested by comparing the wound undermining scores from two different assessors. Intra-rater reliability was tested by comparing the wound undermining scores from the same assessor on two different days.

Results: The intraclass correlation coefficients (95% confidence interval) for inter-rater and intra-rater reliability were 0.996 (0.992-0.999) and 0.998 (0.996-0.999), respectively. Repeat measurements by the same and different assessor were within 0.3 cm of each other, 80% and 83% of the time, respectively.

Conclusion: Measurements of wound undermining have excellent reliability.

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Physical Examination / methods*
  • Pressure Ulcer / diagnosis*
  • Pressure Ulcer / etiology*
  • Pressure Ulcer / physiopathology
  • Psychometrics
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Spinal Cord Injuries / complications*
  • Spinal Cord Injuries / diagnosis*
  • Spinal Cord Injuries / physiopathology
  • Young Adult