Background: The General Movements Assessment (GMA) is a validated and reliable method of identifying infants at risk of adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes, however there is minimal data available on the use of the GMA with infants following surgery.
Aims: The aim of this study was to investigate the inter-observer agreement for the GMA with this infant population.
Study design: Reliability and agreement study.
Subjects: This was a prospective cohort study of 190 infants (male n=112) born at term (mean 38weeks, SD 2weeks).
Outcome measures: A GMA was conducted in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) following either cardiac surgery (n=92), non-cardiac surgery (n=93) or both types of surgery (n=5), and then again at three months of age. All videos were independently assessed by three advanced trained clinicians. Agreement and reliability statistics were calculated between each pair.
Results: We found moderate to substantial levels of agreement in the writhing period (66-77%, AC1=0.53-0.69). For fidgety general movements, agreement was classified as almost perfect, ranging from 86 to 89% (AC1=0.84-0.88).
Conclusions: The GMA has high levels of inter-observer agreement when used with infants who have undergone surgery in the neonatal period, making it a valid, complementary assessment tool. Research is now underway to determine the ability of the GMA to predict neurodevelopmental outcomes in this population.
Keywords: General Movements Assessment; Infant; Inter-observer agreement; Prechtl; Reliability.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.