Study design: Consecutive case series analysis.
Objective: To evaluate the surgical outcomes of patients with thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) in relation to different degrees of geometric torsion.
Summary of background data: AIS is a three-dimensional (3D) deformity of the spine. A 3D classification of AIS, however, remains elusive because there is no widely accepted 3D parameter in the clinical practice. Recently, a new method of estimating geometric torsion has been proposed and detected two potential new 3D subgroups based on geometric torsion values.
Methods: This is an analysis of 93 patients with Lenke type-1 deformity from our institution. 3D reconstructions were obtained using biplanar radiographs both pre- and postoperatively. Geometric torsion was computed using a novel technique by approximating local arc lengths at the neutral vertebra in the thoracolumbar segment. An inter- and intragroup statistical analysis was performed to compare clinical indices of patients with different torsion values. A qualitative assessment was also performed on each patient by two senior staff surgeons.
Results: Statistically significant differences were observed in clinical indices between high (2.85 mm) and low torsion (0.83 mm) Lenke type 1 subgroups. Preoperatively, the high torsion group showed higher Cobb angle values in the thoracic segment (71.18° vs. 63.74°), as well as higher angulation in the thoracolumbar plane of maximum deformity (67.79° vs. 53.30°). Postoperatively, a statistically significant difference was found in the orientation of the plane of maximum deformity in the thoracolumbar segment between the high and low torsion groups (47.95° vs. 30.03°). Results from the qualitative evaluation of surgical results showed different results between the two staff surgeons.
Conclusion: These results suggest a link between preoperative torsion values and surgical outcomes within Lenke type 1 deformities. These results will need to be validated by an independent group, as it is a single-center study.
Level of evidence: 4.