Advantages of the glove port docking technique in robotic single-site cholecystectomy: comparison with the conventional silicone port

J Robot Surg. 2018 Sep;12(3):437-445. doi: 10.1007/s11701-017-0754-5. Epub 2017 Sep 21.

Abstract

Although the da Vinci Single-Site® silicone port allows exact alignment and effective triangulation of instruments, it also has drawbacks. We introduce an alternative docking technique using the Glove port®. From April 2014 to December 2016, respective 50 patients of the conventional silicone port and the glove port group were compared. The mean docking time was 16.6 ± 6.6 min in the silicone port group and 10.6 ± 3.6 min in the glove port group. Re-docking during the operation was needed in three patients in the silicone port group and readjustment of cannulae without re-docking could be simply performed in five patients in the glove port group. Skin injury was observed in 17 patients in the silicone port group and 0 patients in the glove port group without significant complications. Some limitations of the conventional silicone port were improved by the glove port.

Keywords: Cholecystectomy; Minimally invasive surgery; Robotic surgery; Single site; da Vinci surgical system.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Cholecystectomy* / adverse effects
  • Cholecystectomy* / methods
  • Cholecystectomy* / statistics & numerical data
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Laparoscopy
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Postoperative Complications
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Robotic Surgical Procedures* / adverse effects
  • Robotic Surgical Procedures* / methods
  • Robotic Surgical Procedures* / statistics & numerical data
  • Treatment Outcome