Surgical site infection after transoral versus posterior approach for atlantoaxial fusion: a matched-cohort study

J Neurosurg Spine. 2018 Jan;28(1):33-39. doi: 10.3171/2017.5.SPINE161064. Epub 2017 Oct 27.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE In the past, spine surgeons have avoided the transoral approach to the atlantoaxial segment because of concerns for unacceptable patient morbidity. The objective of this study was to measure 30-day postoperative complications, especially surgical site infection (SSI), after transoral versus posterior approach to atlantoaxial fusion. METHODS The source population was provided by the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database, which was queried for all patients who underwent atlantoaxial fusion for degenerative/spondylotic disease and/or trauma between 2005 and 2014. To eliminate bias from unequal sample sizes, patients who underwent the transoral approach were matched with patients who underwent the posterior approach (generally 1:5 ratio) based on age ± 5 years and modified frailty index score (a measure of preoperative comorbidity burden). Because of rare SSI incidence, adjusted odds ratios (ORadj) of SSI were calculated using penalized maximum likelihood estimation. RESULTS A total of 318 patients were included in the study. There were no statistically significant differences between the transoral cohort (n = 56) and the posterior cohort (n = 262) in terms of 30-day postoperative individual complications, including SSI (1.79% vs 1.91%; p = 0.951) and composite complications (10.71% vs 6.87%; p = 0.323). Controlling for sex and smoking, the odds of SSI in the transoral approach were almost equal to the odds in the posterior approach (ORadj 1.17; p = 0.866). While the unplanned reoperation rate of 5.36% after transoral surgery was higher than the 1.53% rate after posterior surgery, the difference approached, but did not reach, statistical significance (p = 0.076). CONCLUSIONS Transoral versus posterior surgery for atlantoaxial fusion did not differ in 30-day unexpected outcomes. Therefore, spinal pathology, rather than concern for postoperative complications, should adjudicate the technical approach to the atlantoaxial segment.

Keywords: ACS = American College of Surgeons; AIC = Akaike information criterion; C-1; C-2; CPT = Current Procedural Terminology; NSQIP = National Surgical Quality Improvement Program; ORadj = adjusted odds ratio; ORunadj = unadjusted odds ratio; SSI = surgical site infection; atlantoaxial; cervical; mFI = modified frailty index; surgical site infection; transoral.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Atlanto-Axial Joint / surgery*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Joint Diseases / diagnostic imaging
  • Joint Diseases / etiology
  • Joint Diseases / surgery*
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures / adverse effects*
  • Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures / methods
  • Mouth / surgery*
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Spinal Fusion / adverse effects*
  • Spinal Fusion / methods
  • Surgical Wound Infection / epidemiology*
  • Time Factors
  • Treatment Outcome