Introduction: The ureter is a retroperitoneal organ. Ureteral injuries are rare, with a prevalence of 0.083% of surgical interventions over 10 years. The objective of this study was to evaluate the surgical management of ureteric injuries according to the time of discovery, their size and their location. We also evaluated the results of this management on the renal repercussion as well as the predictive factors of the severity of the ureteric injuries.
Material and methods: This was a monocentric retrospective study carried out on the basis of a systematic review of the CHU surgery files.
Results: The average follow-up was 30 months. The average hospital stay was 8 days. Thirty-four patients (73.9%) underwent initial endoscopic management by attempting a double J probe. Only 20 patients received this double J probe and only 11 patients (55%) did not recidivate the ureteral injury with a median duration of maintenance of the double J probe of 90 days (28-240). Thirty-five patients received open surgical management (76.1%). We found 57% ureterovesical reimplantations (n=20), corresponding to pelvic ureteral injuries (n=32). We also found 20% of nephrectomies. No patient had recurrence of the ureteral injury. Eight patients had secondary dilatation of the pyelocalicious cavities (28.57%). The success of surgical treatment was therefore 57%.
Conclusion: The management of surgically treated ureter injuries provides good results but remains relatively diversified due to the different lesion levels. It was effective in 57% of cases including nephrectomies as failure of treatment.
Level of evidence: 4.
Keywords: Hydronephrosis; Hydronéphrose; Nephrectomy; Néphrectomie; Plaie urétérale; Réimplantation urétérovésicale; Ureteral injuries; Ureterocystoneostomy.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.