Cost-effectiveness of ceritinib in previously untreated anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive metastatic non-small cell lung cancer in the United States

J Med Econ. 2018 Jun;21(6):577-586. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2018.1443111. Epub 2018 Mar 12.

Abstract

Aims: To assess the cost-effectiveness of first-line ceritinib vs crizotinib and platinum doublet chemotherapy for anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) from a US third-party payer's perspective.

Materials and methods: A partitioned survival model with three health states (stable disease, progressive disease, death) was developed over a 20-year time horizon. Ceritinib's efficacy inputs (progression-free and overall survival) were estimated from ASCEND-4; parametric survival models extrapolated data beyond the trial period. The relative efficacy of ceritinib vs chemotherapy was obtained from ASCEND-4, the relative efficacy of ceritinib vs crizotinib was estimated using a matching-adjusted indirect comparison based on ASCEND-4 and PROFILE 1014. Drug acquisition, treatment administration, adverse event management, and medical costs were obtained from publicly available databases and the literature, and inflated to 2016 US dollars. Treatment-specific stable-state utilities were derived from trials and progressive-state utility from the literature. Incremental costs per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) were estimated for ceritinib vs each comparator. Cost-effectiveness was assessed based on US willingness-to-pay thresholds. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to test model robustness.

Results: In the base case, first-line ceritinib was associated with total direct costs of $299,777 and 3.28 QALYs (from 4.61 life years gained [LYG]) over 20 years. First-line crizotinib and chemotherapy were associated with 2.73 and 2.41 QALYs, 3.92 and 3.53 LYG, and $263,172 and $228,184 total direct costs, respectively. The incremental cost per QALY gained was $66,064 for ceritinib vs crizotinib and $81,645 for ceritinib vs chemotherapy. In the first 2 years following treatment initiation, ceritinib dominated crizotinib by conferring greater health benefits at reduced total costs. Results were robust to deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses.

Limitations: In the absence of head-to-head trials, an indirect comparison method was used.

Conclusions: Ceritinib is cost-effective compared to crizotinib and chemotherapy in the treatment of previously untreated ALK-positive metastatic NCSLC in the US.

Keywords: Anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive; ceritinib; cost-effectiveness; crizotinib; non-small cell lung cancer.

MeSH terms

  • Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase
  • Antineoplastic Agents / adverse effects
  • Antineoplastic Agents / economics
  • Antineoplastic Agents / therapeutic use*
  • Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols / economics
  • Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols / therapeutic use
  • Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung / drug therapy*
  • Cost of Illness
  • Cost-Benefit Analysis
  • Crizotinib
  • Disease-Free Survival
  • Humans
  • Lung Neoplasms / drug therapy*
  • Models, Econometric
  • Pyrazoles / adverse effects
  • Pyrazoles / economics
  • Pyrazoles / therapeutic use*
  • Pyridines / adverse effects
  • Pyridines / economics
  • Pyridines / therapeutic use*
  • Pyrimidines / adverse effects
  • Pyrimidines / economics
  • Pyrimidines / therapeutic use*
  • Quality-Adjusted Life Years
  • Receptor Protein-Tyrosine Kinases / biosynthesis*
  • Sulfones / adverse effects
  • Sulfones / economics
  • Sulfones / therapeutic use*
  • Survival Analysis
  • United States

Substances

  • Antineoplastic Agents
  • Pyrazoles
  • Pyridines
  • Pyrimidines
  • Sulfones
  • Crizotinib
  • ALK protein, human
  • Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase
  • Receptor Protein-Tyrosine Kinases
  • ceritinib