Edoxaban Plus Aspirin vs Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Endovascular Treatment of Patients With Peripheral Artery Disease: Results of the ePAD Trial

J Endovasc Ther. 2018 Apr;25(2):158-168. doi: 10.1177/1526602818760488.

Abstract

Purpose: To report a randomized study that investigated the safety (risk of major bleeds) and potential efficacy of edoxaban, an oral anticoagulant that targets the major components of arterial thrombi, to prevent loss of patency following endovascular treatment (EVT).

Methods: Between February 2012 and June 2014, 203 patients who underwent femoropopliteal EVT were randomized to receive aspirin plus edoxaban or aspirin plus clopidogrel for 3 months in the Edoxaban in Peripheral Arterial Disease (ePAD) study ( ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT01802775). Randomization assigned 101 patients (mean age 68.0±10.4 years; 67 men) to the edoxaban group and 102 patients (mean age 66.7±8.6 years; 78 men) to the clopidogrel group. The primary safety endpoint was bleeding as classified by the TIMI (Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction) criteria and ISTH (International Society of Thrombosis and Hemostasis) criteria; the efficacy endpoint was the rate of restenosis/reocclusion.

Results: There were no major or life-threatening bleeding events in the edoxaban group, while there were 2 major and 2 life-threatening bleeding events in the clopidogrel group by the TIMI criteria. By the ISTH classification, there was 1 major and 1 life-threatening bleeding event vs 5 major and 2 life-threatening bleeding events, respectively [relative risk (RR) 0.20, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.02 to 1.70]. The bleeding risk was not statistically different with either treatment when assessed by TIMI or ISTH. Following 6 months of observation, there was a lower incidence of restenosis/reocclusion with edoxaban compared with clopidogrel (30.9% vs 34.7%; RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.59 to 1.34, p=0.643).

Conclusion: These results suggest that patients who have undergone EVT have similar risks for major and life-threatening bleeding events with edoxaban and aspirin compared with clopidogrel and aspirin. The incidence of restenosis/reocclusion events, while not statistically different, was lower with edoxaban and aspirin, but an adequately sized trial will be needed to confirm these findings.

Keywords: antiplatelet therapy; aspirin; bleeding; clopidogrel; edoxaban; endovascular treatment; femoropopliteal segment; patency; peripheral artery disease; reocclusion; restenosis.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Multicenter Study
  • Randomized Controlled Trial

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Aspirin / administration & dosage*
  • Aspirin / adverse effects
  • Clopidogrel / administration & dosage*
  • Clopidogrel / adverse effects
  • Drug Therapy, Combination
  • Endovascular Procedures* / adverse effects
  • Europe
  • Factor Xa Inhibitors / administration & dosage*
  • Factor Xa Inhibitors / adverse effects
  • Female
  • Fibrinolytic Agents / administration & dosage*
  • Fibrinolytic Agents / adverse effects
  • Hemorrhage / chemically induced
  • Humans
  • Israel
  • Lower Extremity / blood supply*
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Peripheral Arterial Disease / physiopathology
  • Peripheral Arterial Disease / therapy*
  • Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors / administration & dosage*
  • Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors / adverse effects
  • Proof of Concept Study
  • Prospective Studies
  • Pyridines / administration & dosage*
  • Pyridines / adverse effects
  • Recurrence
  • Risk Factors
  • Thiazoles / administration & dosage*
  • Thiazoles / adverse effects
  • Thrombosis / etiology
  • Thrombosis / physiopathology
  • Thrombosis / prevention & control*
  • Time Factors
  • Treatment Outcome
  • United States
  • Vascular Patency / drug effects*

Substances

  • Factor Xa Inhibitors
  • Fibrinolytic Agents
  • Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors
  • Pyridines
  • Thiazoles
  • Clopidogrel
  • edoxaban
  • Aspirin

Associated data

  • ClinicalTrials.gov/NCT01802775