Introduction: Post-transplant infections have been studied widely but data on comparisons of deceased donor liver transplants (DDLT) and living donor liver transplants (LDLT), type and timings of infections, and their relations to outcomes are not explored.
Material and methods: We analysed data from 612 participants of the Adult-to-Adult Living Donor Liver Transplantation Study (A2ALL), a retrospective data set of LDLT and DDLT. We compared the type and timing of the first post-transplant infection in relation to transplant outcomes between the two groups.
Results: Out of 611 patients, 24.5% experienced the first post-transplant infection, the majority of which were bacterial (35.3%), followed by fungal (11%) and viral infections (4.2%). There was no significant difference in the rate, type or timing of infection between LDLT and DDLT. Patients with late (> 1 year) first infection were 1.8 times more likely to die (95% CI: 1.12-2.98, p = 0.015) and 9 times more likely to have graft failures (95% CI: 3.26-24.8, p < 0.001). DDLT recipients who experienced bacterial infection had a significantly lower survival rate compared to LDLT recipients (p < 0.001).
Conclusions: Late infection is associated with lower survival in both DDLT and LDLT. Bacterial infection might be more detrimental for DDLT than LDLT. Late infection should be managed aggressively to improve outcomes.
Keywords: A2ALL; graft failure; infection; liver transplantation; mortality.