The Health and Economic Outcomes of Peanut Allergy Management Practices

J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2018 Nov-Dec;6(6):2073-2080. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2018.04.036. Epub 2018 May 8.

Abstract

Background: Peanut allergy is managed with strict avoidance, epinephrine carriage, and promptly treating reactions.

Objective: The objective of this study was to assess the health and economic benefits of pre-emptively injecting epinephrine for peanut ingestion in the absence of any symptoms, and to avoid products with peanut precautionary allergen labeling (PAL).

Methods: We used Markov modeling and simulations, assuming a base-case 10-fold fatality risk increase for less conservative management, with sensitivity analysis investigating 100- to 1000-fold increased fatality risk, incorporating risks of accidental exposures, reactions, fatality, and family costs of food allergy. Low-dose threshold challenges were used to exclude subjects highly reactive to PAL items.

Results: Based on these assumptions, small reductions in per-patient fatality risk resulted from pre-emptive epinephrine injection without symptoms present (<1 × 10-4 fewer per-patient fatalities), with incremental costs of $1193 per patient, $11,681,501/life year saved, and $110,270,820/death prevented versus waiting for symptoms before use, but this was not cost-effective even assuming 1000-fold risk ($107, 971/quality of life adjusted year) or quality of life (QoL). There were small reductions in per-patient fatality risk (<1 × 10-4 fewer per-patient fatalities) for PAL avoidance versus universal PAL consumption, with incremental costs of $3342 per patient, $19,325,994/life year saved, and $182,434,277/death prevented versus allowing PAL consumption. PAL avoidance was not cost-effective when assuming 1000-fold risk or considering QoL. Incorporating a single, supervised low-dose challenge of 1.5 mg of peanut protein to exclude children reactive to PAL consumption was cost-effective.

Conclusions: Commonly recommended practices of pre-emptive epinephrine injection in the absence of symptoms, or universal avoidance of PAL, were not cost-effective when compared with administering epinephrine on symptom development or allowing PAL consumption.

Keywords: Allergic reaction; Anaphylaxis; Cost-effectiveness; Eliciting dose; Emergency medical services; Epinephrine; Epinephrine autoinjector; Fatal anaphylaxis; Food allergy action plan; Food allergy fatality; Peanut allergy; Precautionary labeling; Quality of life; Simulation.

Publication types

  • Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.

MeSH terms

  • Allergens / immunology
  • Anaphylaxis / prevention & control*
  • Arachis / immunology
  • Child
  • Cost-Benefit Analysis
  • Epinephrine / therapeutic use*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Models, Econometric
  • Peanut Hypersensitivity / drug therapy*
  • Peanut Hypersensitivity / economics
  • Practice Patterns, Physicians'
  • Quality of Life
  • Risk
  • Treatment Outcome

Substances

  • Allergens
  • Epinephrine