Background: Malignant infarction of the middle cerebral artery (MCI) is life threatening. It is associated with a mortality as high as 80%, and survival often at the expense of serious disability. Limited success of medical therapies has resulted in decompressive craniectomy (DC) being increasingly used as a treatment for MCI, although evidence of its efficacy is inconclusive. In this study, the efficacy of DC in improving survival, or survival free of severe disability, was assessed.
Methods: A meta-analysis was performed to approximate the efficacy of DC for treating MCI, considering age and time to surgery. A systematic literature review was conducted on Medline, Embase, and Cochrane library databases to August 1, 2018. Death and severe disability at 3, 6, 12, and 36 months follow-up were assessed, comparing best medical therapy with DC.
Results: 18 studies were eligible for inclusion and represented 987 individuals who received DC. Nine of these were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) (n = 374 DC). Early DC (<48 hours from onset of stroke) reduced mortality (odds ratio [OR] = 0.18, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.11, 0.29; P < 0.00001) but not unfavourable outcome (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] >4) (OR = 1.38, 95% CI = 0.47, 4.11; P = 0.56) at 12 months follow-up. This survival benefit was maintained regardless of age.
Conclusion: Early DC reduces mortality but does not appear to improve favourable outcomes in patients younger or older than 60 years after MCI. RCTs incorporating quality of life assessments are warranted for MCI patients, in addition to defining the optimal timing and benefits of DC in older patients.
Keywords: Decompressive surgery; Hemicraniectomy; Intracranial pressure; Malignant; Middle cerebral artery infarction.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.