A survey assessing adoption of the ACMG-AMP guidelines for interpreting sequence variants and identification of areas for continued improvement
Genet Med
.
2019 Aug;21(8):1699-1701.
doi: 10.1038/s41436-018-0432-7.
Epub 2019 Jan 23.
Authors
Annie Niehaus
1
2
,
Danielle R Azzariti
2
3
,
Steven M Harrison
2
3
,
Marina T DiStefano
2
,
Sarah E Hemphill
2
,
Ozlem Senol-Cosar
2
,
Heidi L Rehm
4
5
6
Affiliations
1
College of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
2
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Partners Healthcare, Cambridge, MA, USA.
3
Medical and Population Genetics, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA.
4
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Partners Healthcare, Cambridge, MA, USA. hrehm@broadinstitute.org.
5
Medical and Population Genetics, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA. hrehm@broadinstitute.org.
6
Center for Genomic Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA. hrehm@broadinstitute.org.
PMID:
30670879
PMCID:
PMC7233466
DOI:
10.1038/s41436-018-0432-7
No abstract available
Publication types
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Comment
MeSH terms
Adenosine Monophosphate
Consensus
Genetics, Medical*
Genomics
Pathology, Molecular*
Surveys and Questionnaires
United States
Substances
Adenosine Monophosphate
Grants and funding
U41 HG006834/HG/NHGRI NIH HHS/United States