Comparison of standardized uptake values between 99mTc-HDP SPECT/CT and 18F-NaF PET/CT in bone metastases of breast and prostate cancer

Samuli Arvola; Ivan Jambor; Anna Kuisma; Jukka Kemppainen; Sami Kajander; Marko Seppänen; Tommi Noponen

doi:10.1186/s13550-019-0475-z

Comparison of standardized uptake values between ^99mTc-HDP SPECT/CT and ¹⁸F-NaF PET/CT in bone metastases of breast and prostate cancer

EJNMMI Res. 2019 Jan 24;9(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s13550-019-0475-z.

Authors

Samuli Arvola¹, Ivan Jambor², Anna Kuisma³, Jukka Kemppainen⁴, Sami Kajander⁴, Marko Seppänen^{5

4}, Tommi Noponen^{5

6}

Affiliations

¹ Department of Clinical Physiology and Nuclear Medicine, Turku University Hospital, Kiinamyllynkatu 4-8, 20521, Turku, Finland. samuli.arvola@tyks.fi.
² Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
³ Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
⁴ Turku PET Centre, Turku, Finland.
⁵ Department of Clinical Physiology and Nuclear Medicine, Turku University Hospital, Kiinamyllynkatu 4-8, 20521, Turku, Finland.
⁶ Department of Medical Physics, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.

Abstract

Background: Despite recent technological advances allowing for quantitative single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), quantitative SPECT has not been widely used in the clinical practice. The aim of this study is to evaluate the feasibility of quantitative SPECT for measuring metastatic bone uptake in breast and prostate cancer by comparing standard uptake values (SUVs) measured with ^99mTc-HDP SPECT/CT and ¹⁸F-NaF PET/CT.

Methods: Twenty-six breast and 27 prostate cancer patients at high risk of bone metastases underwent both ^99mTc-HDP SPECT/CT and ¹⁸F-NaF PET/CT within 14 days of each other. The SPECT and PET data were reconstructed using ordered-subset expectation-maximization algorithms achieving quantitative images. Metastatic and benign skeletal lesions visible in both data sets were identified, and their maximum, peak, and mean SUVs (SUV_max, SUV_peak, and SUV_mean) were determined. SUV ratios (SUVRs) between the lesions and adjacent normal appearing bone were also calculated. Linear regression was used to evaluate the correlations between the SUVs of SPECT and PET and Bland-Altman plots to evaluate the differences between the SUVs and SUVRs of SPECT and PET.

Results: A total of 231 skeletal lesions, 129 metastatic and 102 benign, were analyzed. All three SUV measures correlated very strongly between SPECT and PET (R² ≥ 0.80, p < 0.001) when all lesions were included, and the PET SUVs were significantly higher than SPECT SUVs (p < 0.001). The median differences were 21%, 12%, and 19% for SUV_max, SUV_peak, and SUV_mean, respectively. On the other hand, the SUVRs were similar between SPECT and PET with median differences of 2%, - 9%, and 2% for SUVR_max, SUVR_peak, and SUVR_mean, respectively.

Conclusion: The strong correlation between SUVs and similar SUVRs of ^99mTc-HDP SPECT/CT and ¹⁸F-NaF PET/CT demonstrate that SPECT is an applicable tool for clinical quantification of bone metabolism in osseous metastases in breast and prostate cancer patients.

Keywords: Bone metastases; Quantitative SPECT; SUV SPECT; SUV comparison; SUV ratio.

Abstract

Grants and funding