Recommendations towards standards for quantitative MRI (qMRI) and outstanding needs

Kathryn E Keenan; Joshua R Biller; Jana G Delfino; Michael A Boss; Mark D Does; Jeffrey L Evelhoch; Mark A Griswold; Jeffrey L Gunter; R Scott Hinks; Stuart W Hoffman; Geena Kim; Riccardo Lattanzi; Xiaojuan Li; Luca Marinelli; Gregory J Metzger; Pratik Mukherjee; Robert J Nordstrom; Adele P Peskin; Elena Perez; Stephen E Russek; Berkman Sahiner; Natalie Serkova; Amita Shukla-Dave; Michael Steckner; Karl F Stupic; Lisa J Wilmes; Holden H Wu; Huiming Zhang; Edward F Jackson; Daniel C Sullivan

doi:10.1002/jmri.26598

Recommendations towards standards for quantitative MRI (qMRI) and outstanding needs

J Magn Reson Imaging. 2019 Jun;49(7):e26-e39. doi: 10.1002/jmri.26598. Epub 2019 Jan 24.

Authors

Kathryn E Keenan¹, Joshua R Biller¹, Jana G Delfino², Michael A Boss^{1

3}, Mark D Does⁴, Jeffrey L Evelhoch⁵, Mark A Griswold⁶, Jeffrey L Gunter⁷, R Scott Hinks⁸, Stuart W Hoffman⁹, Geena Kim¹⁰, Riccardo Lattanzi¹¹, Xiaojuan Li¹², Luca Marinelli¹³, Gregory J Metzger¹⁴, Pratik Mukherjee¹⁵, Robert J Nordstrom¹⁶, Adele P Peskin¹⁷, Elena Perez¹⁸, Stephen E Russek¹, Berkman Sahiner², Natalie Serkova¹⁹, Amita Shukla-Dave²⁰, Michael Steckner²¹, Karl F Stupic¹, Lisa J Wilmes²², Holden H Wu²³, Huiming Zhang¹⁶, Edward F Jackson²⁴, Daniel C Sullivan²⁵

Affiliations

¹ Physical Measurement Laboratory, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Boulder, Colorado, USA.
² Center for Devices and Radiological Health, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.
³ Department of Physics, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado, USA.
⁴ Vanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
⁵ Merck Research Laboratories, West Point, Pennsylvania, USA.
⁶ Department of Radiology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
⁷ Departments of Radiology and Information Technology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
⁸ GE Healthcare, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA.
⁹ Rehabilitation Research and Development Service, Department of Veterans Affairs, Washington, DC, USA.
¹⁰ College of Computer & Information Sciences, Regis University, Denver, Colorado, USA.
¹¹ Department of Radiology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA.
¹² Program of Advanced Musculoskeletal Imaging (PAMI), Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
¹³ GE Global Research, Niskayuna, New York, USA.
¹⁴ Department of Radiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
¹⁵ Department of Radiology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
¹⁶ National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
¹⁷ Information Technology Laboratory, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Boulder, Colorado, USA.
¹⁸ Arterys, San Francisco, California, USA.
¹⁹ Department of Radiology, Anschutz Medical Center, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
²⁰ Departments of Medical Physics and Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
²¹ Canon Medical Systems USA, Mayfield Village, Ohio, USA.
²² Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
²³ Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA.
²⁴ Department of Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
²⁵ Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.

Abstract

5 Technical Efficacy: Stage 5 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2019.

Keywords: phantom; quantitative MRI; reference objects; standards; validation.

Publication types

Review

MeSH terms

Anthropometry
Breast / diagnostic imaging
Decision Making
Deep Learning
Equipment Design
Female
Humans
Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted / methods
Image Processing, Computer-Assisted
Magnetic Resonance Imaging / methods*
Magnetic Resonance Imaging / standards*
Male
Phantoms, Imaging
Precision Medicine
Radiology, Interventional
Reference Standards
Reference Values
Reproducibility of Results
Robotics
Software

Abstract

Publication types

MeSH terms

Grants and funding