Setting: Mycobacterial sputum culture is a key diagnostic and research tool.
Objective: To compare mycobacterial culture outcomes of three sputum collection methods.
Design: We compared culture results within sets of three sputum samples collected from 18 HIV-infected adult tuberculosis patients at regular intervals up to 84 days after treatment initiation. The first sputum was collected at home and brought to the clinic, where a second and third sputum were consecutively collected under supervision following mouthwash with bottled water and chlorhexidine solution respectively. All sputa were processed for liquid culture in duplicate.
Results: Out of 556 cultures 430 (77.3%), 91 (16.4%) and 35 (6.3%) were positive, negative or contaminated, respectively. The odds of contamination were higher with home collection and with water rinse than with chlorhexidine rinse (OR: 12.5, p < 0.001 and OR: 6.7, p = 0.015). Chlorhexidine rinse increased the odds of a negative culture compared to water rinse (OR: 3.5, p = 0.002). The odds of a positive culture were greater with water rinse than with home collection (OR: 2.5, p = 0.005). Water rinse significantly reduced time to culture positivity.
Conclusion: Compared to sputum collected at home, chlorhexidine rinse reduces culture contamination and water rinse increases the rate and viable mycobacterial load of positive cultures.
Keywords: Chlorhexidine; HIV-Infection; Mouth wash; Sputum collection; Tuberculosis.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.