Survey on Barriers to Critical Care and Palliative Care Integration

Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2020 Feb;37(2):108-116. doi: 10.1177/1049909119867658. Epub 2019 Aug 15.

Abstract

Purpose: It has been shown that integrating palliative care (PC) in intensive care unit (ICU) improves end-of-life care (EOLC), but very few Canadian hospitals have adopted this practice. Our study aims to evaluate the perceived quality of EOLC at participating institutions and explore barriers toward ICU-PC integration.

Materials and methods: A self-administered questionnaire was developed by a multidisciplinary team. Survey items were extracted from published quality indicators in EOLC and barriers to ICU-PC integration. The study took place at 2 academic institutions. Participants consisted of physicians and nurses, ICU administrators, and allied health workers.

Results: An overall response of 45% was achieved. Of total, 85% of the respondents were ICU nurses. The following main themes were identified: (1) There is a poor presence of PC in the ICU and 78% of respondents felt that increasing ICU-PC integration will improve quality of EOLC; (2) the main barrier to integration was unrealistic patient and/or family expectations; and (3) criteria-triggered consultation to PC was the most feasible way to achieve integration.

Conclusion: Our findings indicate that the majority of respondents perceive that the presence of PC in ICU will improve EOLC. Future quality improvement initiatives can focus on developing a set of criteria for triggering PC consults.

Keywords: critical care; palliative care; quality improvement; terminal care.

MeSH terms

  • Attitude of Health Personnel*
  • Canada
  • Humans
  • Intensive Care Units / standards*
  • Palliative Care / standards*
  • Quality of Health Care
  • Surveys and Questionnaires
  • Terminal Care / standards*