Optimal antithrombotic strategy for atrial fibrillation (AF) patients with a history of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has been under debate. The actual prescription trend of antithrombotic therapy for these patients remains unclear, especially in chronic phase.Patients with AF having at least a 1-year history of PCI were retrospectively evaluated in 2010, 2012, 2014, and 2016. A total of 266 patients were finally enrolled in this study. The proportion of patients prescribed with oral anticoagulants (OACs) gradually increased over the study period (56%, 67%, 73%, and 74% in 2010, 2012, 2014, and 2016, respectively). According to the type of OACs, the proportion of direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC), launched in 2011, increased compared with warfarin (DOAC versus warfarin = 3% versus 64% in 2012, 24% versus 49% in 2014, and 32% versus 42% in 2016). Single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT) with OAC was the most popular prescription every year, and its proportion increased over the study period (41%, 44%, 55%, and 59%, respectively). The proportion of OAC monotherapy gradually increased (2%, 3%, 8%, and 9%, respectively), whereas that of triple therapy, i.e., dual antiplatelet therapy with OAC, gradually decreased (14%, 22%, 8%, and 5% in 2010, 2012, 2014, and 2016, respectively).Antithrombotic therapy trends for AF patients with a history of PCI were changing every year. The prescription rate of triple therapy gradually decreased, in contrast, that of OAC monotherapy gradually increased from 2010 to 2016. However, the evidence for OAC monotherapy in these patients remains insufficient.
Keywords: Coronary artery disease; Direct oral anticoagulant; Warfarin.