Background: The recently recommended single lead-based criterion for the diagnosis of Brugada syndrome may lead to overdiagnosis of this disorder and overestimation of the risk of sudden cardiac death.
Aim: To investigate the value of a single-lead diagnosis in patients with Brugada syndrome and a spontaneous type 1 electrocardiogram.
Methods: Consecutive patients with Brugada syndrome were included in a multicentre prospective registry; only those with a spontaneous type 1 electrocardiogram were enrolled. Clinical and electrocardiogram data were reviewed by two physicians blinded to the patients' clinical and genetic status.
Results: Among 1613 patients, 505 (31%) were enrolled (79% male; mean age 46±15 years). A spontaneous type 1 electrocardiogram pattern was found in one lead in 250 patients (group 1), in two leads in 227 patients (group 2) and in three leads in 27 patients (group 3). Groups were similar except for individuals in group 3, who presented more frequently a fragmented QRS complex, an early repolarization pattern and a prolonged Tpeak-Tend interval. After a mean follow-up of 6.4±4.7 years, ventricular arrhythmia, sudden cardiac death or implantable cardiac defibrillator shock occurred in 46 (9%) patients, without differences between groups.
Conclusion: The prognosis of Brugada syndrome with a spontaneous type 1 electrocardiogram pattern does not appear to be affected by the number of leads required for the diagnosis.
Keywords: Brugada syndrome; Diagnosis; Diagnostic; Dérivations; Electrocardiogram; Leads; Syndrome de Brugada; Électrocardiogramme.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.