An exclusive human milk diet for very low birth weight newborns-A cost-effectiveness and EVPI study for Germany

PLoS One. 2019 Dec 30;14(12):e0226496. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0226496. eCollection 2019.

Abstract

Objectives: Human milk-based fortifiers have shown a protective effect on major complications for very low birth weight newborns. The current study aimed to estimate the cost-effectiveness of an exclusive human milk diet (EHMD) compared to the current approach using cow's milk-based fortifiers in very low birth weight newborns.

Methods: A decision tree model using the health states of necrotising enterocolitis (NEC), sepsis, NEC + sepsis and no complication was used to calculate the cost-effectiveness of an EHMD. For each health state, bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD), retinopathy of prematurity (RoP) and neurodevelopmental problems were included as possible complications; additionally, short-bowel syndrome (SBS) was included as a complication for surgical treatment of NEC. The model was stratified into birth weight categories. Costs for inpatient treatment and long-term consequences were considered from a third party payer perspective for the reference year 2017. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed, including a societal perspective, discounting rate and all input parameter-values.

Results: In the base case, the EHMD was estimated to be cost-effective compared to the current nutrition for very low birth weight newborns with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of €28,325 per Life-Year-Gained (LYG). From a societal perspective, the ICER is €27,494/LYG using a friction cost approach and €16,112/LYG using a human capital approach. Deterministic sensitivity analyses demonstrated that the estimate was robust against changes in the input parameters and probabilistic sensitivity analysis suggested that the probability EHMD was cost-effective at a threshold of €45,790/LYG was 94.8 percent.

Conclusion: Adopting EHMD as the standard approach to nutrition is a cost-effective intervention for very low birth weight newborns in Germany.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Animals
  • Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia / economics*
  • Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia / immunology
  • Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia / therapy
  • Cost-Benefit Analysis
  • Decision Trees
  • Germany
  • Hospitalization / economics
  • Humans
  • Infant Formula
  • Infant, Newborn
  • Infant, Very Low Birth Weight / immunology*
  • Milk / immunology
  • Milk, Human / immunology*
  • Retinopathy of Prematurity / economics*
  • Retinopathy of Prematurity / immunology
  • Retinopathy of Prematurity / therapy*
  • Sepsis / economics*
  • Sepsis / immunology
  • Sepsis / therapy
  • Short Bowel Syndrome / economics*
  • Short Bowel Syndrome / immunology
  • Short Bowel Syndrome / therapy
  • Treatment Outcome

Grants and funding

Both authors, SMS and WG, wish to disclose that the research on which our manuscript is based was funded by an unrestricted research grant by Prolacta BioSciences (https://www.prolacta.com/). We acknowledge support for the Article Processing Charge by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft and the Open Access Publication Fund of Bielefeld University. The funder had no influece on the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish and the preparation of the manuscript. We acknowledge support for the Article Processing Charge by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft and the Open Access Publication Fund of Bielefeld University.