Inhalable dry powders of rifampicin highlighting potential and drawbacks in formulation development for experimental tuberculosis aerosol therapy

Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2020 Mar;17(3):305-322. doi: 10.1080/17425247.2020.1720644. Epub 2020 Feb 4.

Abstract

Introduction: Recently, tuberculosis was reported as the leading cause of death from a single infectious agent. Standard therapy includes administration of four first-line antibiotics, i.e. rifampicin, isoniazid, ethambutol, and pyrazinamide over a period of at least 26 weeks, which in case of rifampicin oftentimes is accompanied by unwanted side effects and variable bioavailability that compromise a positive therapeutic outcome. As the main site of infection is the lungs, it is desirable to develop a therapeutic formulation to be administered via the pulmonary route.Areas covered: This work presents a literature review on studies investigating inhalable dry powder formulations including rifampicin in the context of an experimental tuberculosis therapy, with a special focus on aerosol performance.Expert opinion: It was found that formulation approaches involving different strategies and functional excipients are under investigation but as of now, no formulation has managed to leap into commercial clinical testing. Reasons for this might not primarily be associated with a lack of suitable candidates, but amongst others a lack of suitable in vitro models to assess the efficacy, therapeutic benefit, and cost-effectiveness of the candidate formulations.

Keywords: DPI; NGI; Tuberculosis; aerosol testing; inhalable therapy; rifampicin.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Administration, Inhalation
  • Aerosols
  • Biological Availability
  • Dry Powder Inhalers
  • Excipients / chemistry
  • Humans
  • Lung / microbiology
  • Powders
  • Rifampin / administration & dosage*
  • Tuberculosis / drug therapy*

Substances

  • Aerosols
  • Excipients
  • Powders
  • Rifampin