The role of emergency presentation and revascularization in aneurysms of the peripancreatic arteries secondary to celiac trunk or superior mesenteric artery occlusion

J Vasc Surg. 2020 Jul;72(1S):46S-55S. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2019.11.051. Epub 2020 Feb 21.

Abstract

Objective: The goal of this study was to analyze our 10-year experience in the treatment of aneurysms of the collateral circulation secondary to steno-occlusions of the celiac trunk (CT) or superior mesenteric artery (SMA).

Methods: In the last 10 years, 32 celiac-mesenteric aneurysms were detected (25 true aneurysms and seven pseudoaneurysms) in 25 patients with steno-occlusion of the CT or SMA. All cases were diagnosed and treated at our center, with either surgical or endovascular approach. As open surgery, we performed aneurysmectomy and revascularization; as endovascular treatment we performed both the embolization (or graft exclusion) of the aneurysm sac, and embolization of afferent and efferent arteries.

Results: Sixteen patients (64%) underwent endovascular treatment, accounting for 66% of aneurysms (21/32). Six patients (24%) and seven associated aneurysms (22%) underwent open surgery. Three asymptomatic patients (12%), representing a total of four aneurysms (12%), were not treated. For endovascular procedures, the technical success rate was 90%, with a 56% clinical success rate. For open surgery, clinical and technical success were achieved in five patients (83%) and six procedures (86%), respectively. Sixty-eight percent of patients (17/25) were treated in an emergency setting, using either endovascular (88%) or open (12%) approaches. Although technical success was achieved in more than 85% of these procedures for both approaches, clinical success was reached less frequently among patients with an acute presentation (P = .041). Regardless of the type of treatment, CT or SMA revascularization during the first procedure did not show an increased rate of clinical success (P = .531). However, we reported four cases of visceral ischemia after an endovascular approach without revascularization, with three open surgical corrections required. The mean follow-up was 41 months (range, 0-136 months).

Conclusions: Neither of the approaches described qualifies as a standard optimal choice. We suggest a tailored therapeutic approach based on the clinical condition at the time of diagnosis and specific vascular anatomy.

Keywords: Celiac axis stenosis; Celiac plexus; Endovascular treatment; Gastroduodenal arteries; Median arcuate ligament; Surgical treatment; Visceral aneurysm; Visceral pseudoaneurysm.

Publication types

  • Observational Study

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Aneurysm / diagnostic imaging
  • Aneurysm / etiology
  • Aneurysm / physiopathology
  • Aneurysm / therapy*
  • Aneurysm, False / diagnostic imaging
  • Aneurysm, False / etiology
  • Aneurysm, False / physiopathology
  • Aneurysm, False / therapy*
  • Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation* / adverse effects
  • Celiac Artery / diagnostic imaging
  • Celiac Artery / physiopathology
  • Celiac Artery / surgery*
  • Collateral Circulation
  • Embolization, Therapeutic* / adverse effects
  • Emergencies
  • Endovascular Procedures* / adverse effects
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Mesenteric Artery, Superior / diagnostic imaging
  • Mesenteric Artery, Superior / physiopathology
  • Mesenteric Artery, Superior / surgery*
  • Mesenteric Ischemia / diagnostic imaging
  • Mesenteric Ischemia / physiopathology
  • Mesenteric Ischemia / therapy*
  • Mesenteric Vascular Occlusion / diagnostic imaging
  • Mesenteric Vascular Occlusion / physiopathology
  • Mesenteric Vascular Occlusion / therapy*
  • Middle Aged
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Risk Factors
  • Splanchnic Circulation
  • Treatment Outcome