Preventability of unplanned readmissions within 30 days of discharge. A cross-sectional, single-center study

PLoS One. 2020 Apr 2;15(4):e0229940. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0229940. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

Objectives: To identify the preventability, determinants and causes of unplanned hospital readmissions within 30 days of discharge using a multidisciplinary approach and including patients' perspectives.

Design: A prospective cross-sectional single-center study.

Setting: Urban teaching hospital in Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Participants: 430 patients were included. Inclusion criteria were: age ≥ 18 years, discharged from one of seven participating clinical departments and an unplanned readmission within 30 days.

Methods: Residents from the participating departments individually assessed whether the readmission was caused by healthcare, the preventability and possible causes of readmissions using a tool. Thereafter, the preventability of the cases was discussed in a multidisciplinary meeting with residents of all participating departments and clinical pharmacists. The primary outcome was the proportion of readmissions that were potentially preventable. Secondary outcomes were the determinants for a readmission, causes for preventable readmissions, the change in the final decision on preventability after the multidisciplinary meeting and the value of patient interviews in assessing preventability. Differences in characteristics of potentially preventable readmissions (PPRs) and non-PPRs were analyzed using multivariable logistic regression.

Results: Of 430 readmissions, 56 (13%) were assessed as PPRs. Age was significantly associated with a PPR (adjusted OR: 2.42; 95%, CI 1.23-4.74; p = 0.01). The main causes for PPRs were diagnostic (30%), medication (27%) and management problems (27%). During the multidisciplinary meeting, the final decision on preventability changed in 11% of the cases. When a patient interview was available, it was used as a source of information to assess preventability in 26% of readmissions. In 7% of cases, the patient interview was mentioned as the most important source.

Conclusion and implications: 13% of readmissions were potentially preventable with diagnostic, medication or management problems being main causes. A multidisciplinary review approach and including the patient's perspective could contribute to a better understanding of the complexity of readmissions and possible improvements.

Publication types

  • Observational Study
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Age Factors
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Clinical Decision-Making*
  • Cross-Sectional Studies
  • Female
  • Hospitals, Teaching
  • Hospitals, Urban
  • Humans
  • Logistic Models
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Netherlands
  • Patient Discharge / statistics & numerical data*
  • Patient Participation
  • Patient Readmission / statistics & numerical data*
  • Physician-Patient Relations*

Grants and funding

FK received a grant from the inhouse OLVG innovation fund (2015). The innovation fund has no website/URL and issue no grant numbers. Calls for proposals are communicated twice a year through the inhouse hospital newsletter. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.