Background: A syndromic gastrointestinal pathogen panel (GIP) was implemented in May 2018. All positive (+) GIP and standard-of-care (SOC) C. difficile results were reviewed.
Methods: A single-center audit of adult patients with GIP results was conducted May-December 2018. We reviewed GIP(+)/SOC(+/-) and GIP(-)/SOC(-) tests (control group) for clinical outcomes.
Results: We reviewed 269 GIP(+) patients. Of 119 GIP(+)/SOC(+) patients, 44 (37%) were positive by toxin A/B enzyme immunoassay, and 75 (63%) by PCR only. Thirty-day mortality and re-admission were not significantly different between groups. CDI rates within 6 months were not significantly different between GIP(+)/SOC(-) and controls (p-value = 0.39). Those with initial SOC(+) tests had more true CDI events within 6 months, compared to controls (p-values < 0.001).
Conclusions: Forty percent of patients with GIP(+) C. difficile were (-) by SOC test, suggesting that true CDI was not present. Additional PCR-based testing may not impact outcomes.
Keywords: Clostridiodes difficile infection; diagnostic stewardship; gastrointestinal pathogen panel.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.