The Diagnostic Dilemma of Malignant Biliary Strictures

Diagnostics (Basel). 2020 May 25;10(5):337. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics10050337.

Abstract

The differential diagnosis for biliary strictures is broad. However, the likelihood of malignancy is high. Determining the etiology of a biliary stricture requires a comprehensive physical exam, laboratory evaluation, imaging, and ultimately tissue acquisition. Even then, definitive diagnosis is elusive, and many strictures remain indeterminant in origin. This literary review examines the diagnostic dilemma of biliary strictures and presents innovations in both histochemical and endoscopic techniques that have increased the diagnostic power of differentiating benign and malignant strictures. The field of tissue biopsy is revolutionizing with the advent of free DNA mutation profiling, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), and methionyl t-RNA synthetase 1 (MARS 1), which allow for greater testing sensitivity. Endoscopic ultrasound, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), cholangioscopy, confocal laser endomicroscopy, and intraductal ultrasound build upon existing endoscopic technology to better characterize strictures that would otherwise be indeterminate in etiology. This review uses recent literature to insert innovative technology into the traditional framework of diagnostic methods for malignant biliary strictures.

Keywords: cholangioscopy; confocal laser endomicroscopy; endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography; endoscopic ultrasound; fine-needle aspiration and biopsy; hepatobiliary malignancy; intraductal ultrasound; malignant biliary stricture; pancreatic cancer.

Publication types

  • Review