Effect of biceps tenodesis on speed of recovery after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair

Dragomir Mijic; Jennifer Kurowicki; Derek Berglund; Samuel Rosas; Emmanuel McNeely; Matthew Motisi; Teja Polisetty; Jonathan C Levy

doi:10.1016/j.jseint.2019.12.010

Effect of biceps tenodesis on speed of recovery after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair

JSES Int. 2020 Feb 24;4(2):341-346. doi: 10.1016/j.jseint.2019.12.010. eCollection 2020 Jun.

Authors

Dragomir Mijic¹, Jennifer Kurowicki², Derek Berglund³, Samuel Rosas⁴, Emmanuel McNeely⁵, Matthew Motisi⁶, Teja Polisetty¹, Jonathan C Levy¹

Affiliations

¹ Department of Orthopedics, Holy Cross Orthopedic Research Institute, Fort Lauderdale, FL, USA.
² Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Seton Hall University, Nutley, NH, USA.
³ Department of General Surgery, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, PA, USA.
⁴ Department of Orthopaedic Surgery Research, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
⁵ Medical School, Charles E. Schmidt College of Medicine, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL, USA.
⁶ Department of Orthopedics, Broward Health Medical Center, Fort Lauderdale, FL, USA.

Abstract

Background: Concomitant biceps tendon pathology is often present in patients undergoing rotator cuff repair (RCR). Management of biceps pathology has been reported to influence outcomes of RCR; however, the impact on the pace of recovery remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to analyze the effects of simultaneous RCR with biceps tenodesis (RCR-BT) on time to achieve maximum improvement and recovery speed for pain and function.

Methods: A retrospective review of 535 patients who underwent primary RCR for full-thickness tears. Patients treated with simultaneous RCR-BT were compared with RCR-only. Outcome measures and motion were recorded at preoperative routine postoperative intervals. Plateau in maximal improvement and recovery speed were analyzed for both pain and functional recovery.

Results: Baseline American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form (ASES) function was significantly lower for the RCR-BT cohort (20.5) compared with RCR-only (23.9; P = .008). For visual analog scale (VAS) pain and measured motion, the plateau in maximal improvement occurred at 6 months for RCR-BT compared with 12 months for the RCR-only group. The remainder of the patient-reported outcome measures took 12 months to achieve a plateau in maximal improvement. At 3 months, 79% of improvement in pain and 42%-49% of functional improvement was achieved in the RCR-BT cohort. Similarly, at 3 months, the RCR-only cohort achieved 73% of pain improvement and 36%-57% of functional improvement at 3 months.

Conclusion: Patients requiring RCR with simultaneous biceps tenodesis have lower baseline ASES function and earlier postoperative plateaus in pain relief and motion improvement following surgery. Nonetheless, the speed of recovery was not influenced by the biceps tenodesis.

Keywords: Biceps tenodesis; arthroscopic rotator cuff tear; concomitant; patient-reported outcome measures; plateau; range of motion; speed of recovery.