Postoperative Urinary Retention after Benign Gynecologic Surgery with a Liberal versus Strict Voiding Protocol

Abstract

Study objective: Surgeons employ various methods for evaluating what is considered a common occurrence after gynecologic operations, postoperative urinary retention (POUR). Few have reported the incidence of POUR with a liberal voiding protocol (no requirement to void before discharge). The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the risk of POUR after benign gynecologic surgery, comparing a liberal voiding protocol with more strict voiding protocols. Secondary outcomes included length of hospital stay (LOS) and urinary tract infection (UTI).

Design: Retrospective cohort study.

Setting: Quaternary-care academic hospital in the United States.

Patients: Patients undergoing hysterectomy or myomectomy at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center from August 2017 through July 2018 (n = 652). Cases involving incontinence operations, correction of pelvic organ prolapse, malignancy, or peripartum hysterectomy were excluded.

Interventions: Hysterectomy, myomectomy.

Measurements and main results: POUR, defined as the need for recatheterization within 24 hours of catheter removal, along with UTI and LOS were compared between liberal and strict voiding protocols. A subgroup analysis was performed for those undergoing minimally invasive surgery (MIS). A total of 303 (46.5%) women underwent surgery with a liberal postoperative voiding protocol and 349 (53.5%) women with a strict voiding protocol. Overall, the incidence of POUR was low at 3.8% and not different between the groups (2.6% liberal vs. 4.9% strict, p = .14). UTIs also occurred infrequently (2.8% overall, 2.6% liberal vs. 2.9% strict, p = .86). Similar results were seen specifically among those who underwent MIS: POUR (3.7% overall, 2.8% liberal vs. 5.3% strict, p = .17) and UTI (3.3% overall, 2.4% liberal vs. 4.7% strict, p = .28). The median LOS (interquartile range) was much shorter for MIS patients with a liberal voiding protocol (median 15 hours overall [interquartile range 15 hours], 9 [4] hours liberal vs. 36 [34] hours strict, p <.01). Among those discharged the same day (72.6% of the MIS cases), patients with a liberal voiding protocol had a significantly shorter LOS than those with strict (mean [standard deviation] 9.4 [2.5] hours vs. 10.6 [35] hours, p <.01). Postoperative complications occurred less frequently in those with MIS procedures (11.8% in MIS vs. 20.2% in laparotomies, p <.01) and those with liberal voiding protocols (11.2% liberal vs. 16.9% strict p = .04).

Conclusion: Overall, POUR occurs infrequently after major benign gynecologic surgery and does not differ between those with liberal and strict voiding protocols. Our data suggest that same-day discharge after MIS hysterectomy and myomectomy without a requirement to void does not increase the risk of POUR and shortens LOS. Eliminating voiding protocols after these procedures may facilitate greater efficiency in the postanesthesia recovery unit and may contribute to enhanced recovery after surgery protocols.

Keywords: Hysterectomy; Laparoscopy; Minimally invasive surgery; Myomectomy; Same-day discharge.