Promoting health-related cardiorespiratory fitness in physical education: A systematic review

PLoS One. 2020 Aug 3;15(8):e0237019. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0237019. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

Background: This article aimed to systematically review the contribution of physical education (PE) classes to improve cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) in children and adolescents; and to define potentially relevant factors for promoting CRF in PE classes.

Methods: Studies were identified from searches in ERIC, PubMed, SPORTDiscus, and Web of Science databases. Primary source articles, relating PE classes and CRF, published up to July 2019 in peer-reviewed journals were eligible for inclusion. Specific inclusion criteria were: (a) having cross-sectional or longitudinal and observational or interventional study designs; (b) targeting school-aged children or adolescents; (c) measuring CRF, heart rate or CRF test results as an outcome; (d) having statistical analyses of the CRF, heart rate or CRF test results outcomes reported; (e) focusing on PE classes or PE interventions that did not extended time or frequency of the classes; and (f) published in English, French, Portuguese, or Spanish.

Results: A total of 24 studies met the inclusion criteria. Overall, 10 studies have found a neutral effect of PE classes in students' CRF, eight studies found that PE indeed contributed to the improvement of CRF and six studies revealed mixed findings, when PE classes where controlled for others variables (e.g. body mass index, intensity). Higher intensity PE classes consistently demonstrated contributions to improving students' CRF.

Conclusion: Review findings suggest that PE classes can contribute to the improvement of students' CRF. Intensity, age and weight status were identified as potentially relevant factors for promoting CRF in PE classes. To improve CRF, higher intensity classes should be provided.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
  • Systematic Review

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Cardiorespiratory Fitness / physiology*
  • Cardiorespiratory Fitness / psychology*
  • Child
  • Cross-Sectional Studies
  • Exercise / physiology
  • Exercise / psychology
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Physical Education and Training / methods*
  • Physical Education and Training / trends
  • Physical Fitness / physiology
  • Students / psychology

Grants and funding

MP is supported by a PhD scholarship grant (SFRH/BD/122219/2016) from the Portuguese Science and Technology Foundation (https://www.fct.pt/). The funder had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.