Cystatin C and Muscle Mass in Patients With Heart Failure

Abstract

Background: The estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) from cystatin C (eGFRcys) is often considered a more accurate method to assess GFR compared with an eGFR from creatinine (eGFRcr) in the setting of heart failure (HF) and sarcopenia, because cystatin C is hypothesized to be less affected by muscle mass than creatinine. We evaluated (1) the association of muscle mass with cystatin C, (2) the accuracy of eGFRcys, and (3) the association of eGFRcys with mortality given muscle mass.

Methods and results: We included 293 patients admitted with HF. Muscle mass was estimated with a validated creatinine excretion-based equation. Accuracy of eGFRcys and eGFRcr was compared with measured creatinine clearance. Cystatin C and creatinine were 31.7% and 59.9% higher per 14 kg higher muscle mass at multivariable analysis (both P < .001). At lower muscle mass, eGFRcys and eGFRcr overestimated the measured creatinine clearance. At higher muscle mass, eGFRcys underestimated the measured creatinine clearance, but eGFRcr did not. After adjusting for muscle mass, neither eGFRcys nor eGFRcr were associated with mortality (both P > .19).

Conclusions: Cystatin C levels were associated with muscle mass in patients with HF, which could potentially decrease the accuracy of eGFRcys. In HF where aberrations in body composition are common, eGFRcys, like eGFRcr, may not provide accurate GFR estimations and results should be interpreted cautiously.

Keywords: Heart failure; cystatin C; glomerular filtration rate; muscle mass.