Hydrodiplomacy and adaptive governance at the U.S.-Mexico border: 75 years of tradition and innovation in transboundary water management

Margaret O Wilder; Robert G Varady; Andrea K Gerlak; Stephen P Mumme; Karl W Flessa; Adriana A Zuniga-Teran; Christopher A Scott; Nicolás Pineda Pablos; Sharon B Megdal

doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2020.05.013

Hydrodiplomacy and adaptive governance at the U.S.-Mexico border: 75 years of tradition and innovation in transboundary water management

Environ Sci Policy. 2020 Oct:112:189-202. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2020.05.013. Epub 2020 Jun 27.

Authors

Margaret O Wilder¹, Robert G Varady², Andrea K Gerlak¹, Stephen P Mumme³, Karl W Flessa⁴, Adriana A Zuniga-Teran², Christopher A Scott², Nicolás Pineda Pablos⁵, Sharon B Megdal⁶

Affiliations

¹ School of Geography, Development and Environment, University of Arizona, P.O. Box 210137, Tucson, AZ, USA.
² Udall Center for Studies in Public Policy, University of Arizona, 803 E. 1St., Tucson, AZ 85719 USA.
³ Department of Political Science, Colorado State University, 1782 Campus Delivery, Fort Collins, CO 80523 USA.
⁴ Department of Geosciences, University of Arizona, 1040 E. 4St., Tucson, AZ 85721 USA.
⁵ Public Policy Studies, El Colegio de Sonora, Calle Gral Álvaro Obregón 54, Centro, 83000, Hermosillo, Son., Mexico.
⁶ Water Resources Research Center, University of Arizona, 350 N. Campbell Avenue, Tucson, AZ 85719 USA.

Abstract

The United States and Mexico have engaged in hydrodiplomacy-a practice of transboundary water management that blends water diplomacy and science diplomacy--for more than 75 years, since the adoption of the Treaty of 1944 and the creation of the International Boundary and Water Commission. We examine six major turning points in U.S.-Mexico hydrodiplomacy to ascertain the key factors in the region's history of resolving transboundary water issues. We find that recognized adaptive governance indicators-such as social learning, sustained relationships, flexible governance mechanisms, and state and non-state networks are essential elements of hydrodiplomacy. Our research suggests that robust and foundational institutions comprise another key indicator of adaptive governance specifically in transboundary contexts. A commitment to both science and diplomacy have been important components underlying the effectiveness of hydrodiplomacy in the border region. Binational networks involving diverse state and non-state actors at multiple scales have increasingly played a pivotal role in shaping desirable hydrodiplomatic outcomes in the region.

Keywords: Adaptive governance; Hydrodiplomacy; Transboundary; U.S.-Mexico; Water diplomacy.