Body and Boat: Significance of Morphology on Elite Rowing Performance

Quentin De Larochelambert; Scott Del Vecchio; Arthur Leroy; Stephanie Duncombe; Jean-Francois Toussaint; Adrien Sedeaud

doi:10.3389/fspor.2020.597676

Body and Boat: Significance of Morphology on Elite Rowing Performance

Front Sports Act Living. 2020 Dec 2:2:597676. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2020.597676. eCollection 2020.

Authors

Quentin De Larochelambert¹, Scott Del Vecchio¹, Arthur Leroy², Stephanie Duncombe¹, Jean-Francois Toussaint^{1

2

3}, Adrien Sedeaud¹

Affiliations

¹ EA7329, Institute for Research in BioMedicine and Epidemiology of Sport (IRMES), Paris, France.
² MAP5 - Université de Paris, Paris, France.
³ CIMS, Hôtel-Dieu, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France.

Abstract

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to determine and weigh the anthropometric indicators that were associated with pacing performances for each Olympic rowing category. Methods: Between 2010 and 2015, 1,148 rowers (650 men and 498 women) participated in the finals of World Championships in each heavyweight Olympic event. They were categorized into four morphological clusters according to their height and body mass index (BMI): tall and thin (TT), tall and robust (TR), small and thin (ST), and small and robust (SR). Time and speed, were collected every 50 m for all boats in each competition. Non-parametric inferential methods were used to understand the differences in performance between morphological clusters over the entire race. After, we calculated a new indicator to determine the differences between these morphotypes within the race. Results: In this article, we determined which morphologies had a significant effect on speed for both men and women. For example, the biggest rowers were the fastest in skiff. Analysis of each 50 m demonstrated that between the four morphological categories that the TR male athletes were significantly faster than their ST counterparts between the 800 and 2,000 m of the race by 1.76% of mean speed. Furthermore, the SR were the fastest in female coxless pairs over the majority of the race. These differences in speed by morphological cluster are summarized, by race segment, for all categories and sex. Conclusion: Anthropometric factors impact pacing among rowers' categories. Coupling anthropometry and race pacing is not only helpful to understand which factors work where, but is also helpful in improving training and performance. This can help both in the recruiting of rowers for specific boats and adapting the race strategy. In future, the method used can be adapted for factors other than anthropometry. It can also be individualized to enable athletes to prepare for their race according to future competitors.

Keywords: anthropometry; height; morphology; pacing; performance; rowing.