An evaluation of enhanced surveillance of hospitalised COVID-19 patients to inform the public health response in Victoria

Stephanie J Curtis; Zoe Cutcher; Judith A Brett; Simon Burrell; Michael J Richards; Daneeta Hennessy; Rebecca F Gang; Colleen L Lau; Stacey Rowe

doi:10.33321/cdi.2020.44.98

An evaluation of enhanced surveillance of hospitalised COVID-19 patients to inform the public health response in Victoria

Commun Dis Intell (2018). 2020 Nov 24:44. doi: 10.33321/cdi.2020.44.98.

Authors

Stephanie J Curtis^{1

2}, Zoe Cutcher², Judith A Brett³, Simon Burrell³, Michael J Richards³, Daneeta Hennessy², Rebecca F Gang², Colleen L Lau⁴, Stacey Rowe²

Affiliations

¹ National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, the Australian National University, Australia Capital Territory, Australia.
² Department of Health and Human Services, Victoria, Australia.
³ Victorian Healthcare Associated Infection Surveillance System Coordinating Centre, the Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Victoria, Australia.
⁴ Department of Global Health, the Australian National University, Australia Capital Territory, Australia.

PMID: 33357173
DOI: 10.33321/cdi.2020.44.98

Abstract

Background: Public health surveillance is crucial for supporting a rapid and effective response to public health emergencies. In response to the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic, an enhanced surveillance system of hospitalised COVID-19 patients was established by the Victorian Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) and the Victorian Healthcare Associated Infection Surveillance System Coordinating Centre. The system aimed to reduce workforce capacity constraints and increase situational awareness on the status of hospitalised patients.

Methods: The system was evaluated, using guidelines from the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, against eight attributes: acceptability; data quality; flexibility; representativeness; simplicity; stability; timeliness; and usefulness. Evidence was generated from stakeholder consultation, participant observation, document review, systems review, issues log review and audits. Data were collected and analysed over a period of up to three months, covering pre- and post-implementation from March to June 2020.

Results: This system was rapidly established by leveraging established relationships and infrastructure. Stakeholders agreed that the system was important but was limited by a reliance on daily manual labour (including weekends), which impeded scalability. The ability of the system to perform well in each attribute was expected to shift with the severity of the pandemic; however, at the time of this evaluation, when there were an average 23 new cases per day (0.3 cases per 100,000 population per day), the system performed well.

Conclusion: This enhanced surveillance system was useful and achieved its key DHHS objectives during the COVID-19 public health emergency in Victoria. Recommendations for improvement were made to the current and future systems, including the need to plan alternatives to improve the system's scalability and to maintain stakeholder acceptability.

Keywords: emergency response; evaluation; hospitalisations; pandemic; surveillance; coronavirus.

MeSH terms

COVID-19 / diagnosis
COVID-19 / epidemiology*
Data Accuracy
Hospitalization / statistics & numerical data*
Humans
Population Surveillance / methods*
Program Evaluation
Public Health / methods*
Public Health / standards
Public Health Administration
SARS-CoV-2
Stakeholder Participation
Time Factors
Victoria / epidemiology