Meta-analysis of light and circadian timekeeping in rodents

Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2021 Apr:123:215-229. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2020.12.024. Epub 2021 Jan 26.

Abstract

We conducted a meta-analysis of papers published over the past half-century (1964-2017) that quantified the phase-shifting effects of timed light exposure on rodent locomotor rhythms. Descriptive statistics were tabulated in order to explore the extent to which these studies were generalizable across species, sex, age, circadian timing, and light sources. Attempts at understanding photic resetting were primarily targeted at younger male animals, with particular emphases placed on characterizing the pacemaker systems of C57BL/6 mice and Syrian hamsters during the parts of their subjective night most sensitive to delivery of white-fluorescent light. With subsequent analyses restricted to these rodent models, we then assessed the relationship between luminous exposure (via broadspectrum emission) and phase-shifting through a series of linear regressions. Monotonically increasing illuminance-response functions were noted at most circadian times surveyed. In the aggregate, our results show that previous research conducted on light's regulation of circadian timekeeping has been skewed in design with respect to several important biological variables. This bias might limit translation of phototherapy-relevant data to women and older individuals.

Keywords: C57BL/6; Circadian; Hamster; Light; Phase-shifting; Photic; Resetting; Rhythms; Rodents.

Publication types

  • Meta-Analysis
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Animals
  • Circadian Rhythm*
  • Cricetinae
  • Male
  • Mesocricetus
  • Mice
  • Mice, Inbred C57BL
  • Photic Stimulation
  • Rodentia*
  • Suprachiasmatic Nucleus