Effectiveness of intervention program on the change of glycaemic control in diabetes with depression patients: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies

Prim Care Diabetes. 2021 Jun;15(3):428-434. doi: 10.1016/j.pcd.2021.01.006. Epub 2021 Feb 5.

Abstract

Aim: The glycaemic control of diabetes with depression was inconsistent from randomized controlled studies. This meta-analysis aimed to explore the effectiveness of intervention methods in diabetes with depression.

Methods: This study systematically searched electronic databases (PubMed, EBSCO, Elsevier, Springer, Wiley, and Cochrane) for studies published up to August 17, 2020. Standardized mean difference (SMD) and 95%CI were used to evaluate the effectiveness of interventions on HbA1c. Heterogeneity was estimated using the I2 statistic. Begg's test was used to assess the possible publication bias among studies.

Results: Twelve studies of 2444 cases were included in this study. The overall SMD is -0.22 and 95%CI -0.33 to -0.10 in 0-6 months of intervention group. The I2 and P were 18.4% and 0.26. There are no publication bias tested (z = 0.37, P = 0.72).

Conclusion: Cognitive behavioral therapy and mindful self-compassion might be effective method to improve glycaemic control of diabetes with depression in 0-6 months.

Keywords: Depression; Diabetes; Glycaemic control; HbA1c; Meta-analysis.

Publication types

  • Meta-Analysis
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Cognitive Behavioral Therapy*
  • Depression / diagnosis
  • Depression / prevention & control
  • Diabetes Mellitus*
  • Glycemic Control
  • Humans