Comparison of Sepsis Definitions as Automated Criteria

Crit Care Med. 2021 Apr 1;49(4):e433-e443. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004875.

Abstract

Objectives: Assess the impact of heterogeneity among established sepsis criteria (Sepsis-1, Sepsis-3, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Adult Sepsis Event, and Centers for Medicare and Medicaid severe sepsis core measure 1) through the comparison of corresponding sepsis cohorts.

Design: Retrospective analysis of data extracted from electronic health record.

Setting: Single, tertiary-care center in St. Louis, MO.

Patients: Adult, nonsurgical inpatients admitted between January 1, 2012, and January 6, 2018.

Interventions: None.

Measurements and main results: In the electronic health record data, 286,759 encounters met inclusion criteria across the study period. Application of established sepsis criteria yielded cohorts varying in prevalence: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Adult Sepsis Event (4.4%), Centers for Medicare and Medicaid severe sepsis core measure 1 (4.8%), International Classification of Disease code (7.2%), Sepsis-3 (7.5%), and Sepsis-1 (11.3%). Between the two modern established criteria, Sepsis-3 (n = 21,550) and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Adult Sepsis Event (n = 12,494), the size of the overlap was 7,763. The sepsis cohorts also varied in time from admission to sepsis onset (hr): Sepsis-1 (2.9), Sepsis-3 (4.1), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Adult Sepsis Event (4.6), and Centers for Medicare and Medicaid severe sepsis core measure 1 (7.6); sepsis discharge International Classification of Disease code rate: Sepsis-1 (37.4%), Sepsis-3 (40.1%), Centers for Medicare and Medicaid severe sepsis core measure 1 (48.5%), and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Adult Sepsis Event (54.5%); and inhospital mortality rate: Sepsis-1 (13.6%), Sepsis-3 (18.8%), International Classification of Disease code (20.4%), Centers for Medicare and Medicaid severe sepsis core measure 1 (22.5%), and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Adult Sepsis Event (24.1%).

Conclusions: The application of commonly used sepsis definitions on a single population produced sepsis cohorts with low agreement, significantly different baseline demographics, and clinical outcomes.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Databases, Factual / statistics & numerical data*
  • Humans
  • International Classification of Diseases
  • Outcome Assessment, Health Care
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Sepsis / classification*
  • Sepsis / diagnosis*
  • Sepsis / epidemiology
  • Severity of Illness Index*
  • Shock, Septic / classification
  • Shock, Septic / diagnosis
  • United States