[A study of LEF1 protein expression in diagnosis and differential diagnosis of lymphoblastic lymphoma/acute lymphoblastic leukemia]

Zhonghua Bing Li Xue Za Zhi. 2021 Mar 8;50(3):207-212. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112151-20200513-00379.
[Article in Chinese]

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the expression of LEF1 protein in lymphoblastic lymphoma/acute lymphoblastic leukemia (LBL/ALL) and small B-cell lymphomas, and its value in pathologic diagnosis and differential diagnosis of LBL/ALL. Methods: 53 cases of LBL/ALL were collected at shanghai Tongji Hospital from January 2012 to December 2019. The protein expression of LEF1 and TdT was detected by immunohistochemistry in 53 paraffin-embedded tissue samples of LBL/ALL. The specificity and sensitivity of LEF1 and TdT in the diagnosis of LBL/ALL were compared. The expression of LEF1 protein in 77 cases of small B-cell lymphomas including chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphoid lymphoma (CLL/SLL), follicular lymphoma, mantle cell lymphoma, marginal zone lymphoma and Waldenstrom's macroglobulinemia/lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma was studied. The correlation between LEF1 expression and overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) was performed by univariate analysis. Results: The expression of LEF1 in LBL/ALL was 100% (53/53), the median value was 90%; the expression of TdT was 84.9% (T-LBL/ALL 78.1%, B-LBL/ALL 95.2%), the median value was 80%; the expression rate and median value of LEF1 and TdT were significantly different (P=0.008 and 0.001 respectively). The expression of LEF1 in CLL/SLL was 14/18, the median value was 45%; LEF1 was not expressed in follicular lymphoma (0/16), mantle cell lymphoma (0/16), marginal zone lymphoma (0/19), and Waldenstrom's macroglobulinemia/lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma (0/8). LEF1 expression was significantly different between B-LBL/ALL and small B-cell lymphomas. The median follow-up time of LBL/ALL cases in this group was 16 months. There was no statistical difference between LEF1 expression and the OS and PFS in LBL/ALL patients. Conclusions: Immunohistochemical staining of LEF1 has high sensitivity and good specificity in the diagnosis of LBL/ALL, and its combination with TdT can improve the diagnostic rate of LBL/ALL.

目的: 研究淋巴样增强结合因子1(LEF1)蛋白在淋巴母细胞淋巴瘤/急性淋巴细胞白血病(LBL/ALL)和小B细胞淋巴瘤中的表达,探讨其在LBL/ALL病理诊断及鉴别诊断中的价值。 方法: 收集2012年1月至2019年12月上海市同济医院就诊及会诊的53例LBL/ALL石蜡组织标本,采用免疫组织化学法检测LEF1、末端脱氧核苷酸转移酶(TdT)蛋白表达,比较LEF1和TdT诊断的特异度、灵敏度。检测小B细胞淋巴瘤包括慢性淋巴细胞白血病/小淋巴细胞淋巴瘤(CLL/SLL)、滤泡性淋巴瘤、套细胞淋巴瘤、边缘区B细胞淋巴瘤、华氏巨球蛋白血症/淋巴浆细胞淋巴瘤共77例LEF1蛋白表达,比较LBL/ALL与各亚型小B细胞淋巴瘤LEF1蛋白表达差异。单因素分析LEF1蛋白表达与LBL/ALL患者总生存与无进展生存的相关性。 结果: LBL/ALL中LEF1蛋白表达阳性率为100%(53/53),中位值90%;TdT阳性率为84.9%(45/53;T-LBL/ALL为78.1%,B-LBL/ALL为95.2%),中位值80%;LEF1和TdT阳性率及中位值差异均有统计学意义(P值分别为0.008,0.001)。CLL/SLL LEF1蛋白表达阳性比例为14/18,中位值45%;滤泡性淋巴瘤(0/16)、套细胞淋巴瘤(0/16)、边缘区B细胞淋巴瘤(0/19)、华氏巨球蛋白血症/淋巴浆细胞淋巴瘤(0/8)LEF1蛋白均为阴性。B-LBL/ALL与小B细胞淋巴瘤比较,LEF1阳性率有显著差异。本组LBL/ALL病例中位随访时间16个月,LEF1蛋白表达与LBL/ALL总生存和无进展生存差异无统计学意义。 结论: LEF1免疫组织化学检测诊断LBL/ALL有很高的灵敏度和较好的特异度,与TdT联用可提高LBL/ALL诊断率。.

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Biomarkers, Tumor*
  • China
  • Diagnosis, Differential
  • Humans
  • Immunohistochemistry
  • Lymphoid Enhancer-Binding Factor 1
  • Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma* / diagnosis

Substances

  • Biomarkers, Tumor
  • LEF1 protein, human
  • Lymphoid Enhancer-Binding Factor 1