Environmental Risk Factors and Congenital Heart Disease: An Umbrella Review of 165 Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses With More Than 120 Million Participants

Tie-Ning Zhang; Qi-Jun Wu; Ya-Shu Liu; Jia-Le Lv; Hui Sun; Qing Chang; Chun-Feng Liu; Yu-Hong Zhao

doi:10.3389/fcvm.2021.640729

Environmental Risk Factors and Congenital Heart Disease: An Umbrella Review of 165 Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses With More Than 120 Million Participants

Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021 Mar 11:8:640729. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.640729. eCollection 2021.

Authors

Tie-Ning Zhang^{1

2

3}, Qi-Jun Wu^{1

2}, Ya-Shu Liu^{1

2}, Jia-Le Lv^{1

2}, Hui Sun^{1

2}, Qing Chang^{1

2}, Chun-Feng Liu³, Yu-Hong Zhao^{1

2}

Affiliations

¹ Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
² Clinical Research Center, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
³ Department of Pediatrics, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.

Abstract

Background: The etiology of congenital heart disease (CHD) has been extensively studied in the past decades. Therefore, it is critical to clarify clear hierarchies of evidence between types of environmental factors and CHD. Methods: Electronic searches in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane database were conducted from inception to April 20, 2020 for meta-analyses investigating the aforementioned topic. Results: Overall, 41 studies including a total of 165 meta-analyses of different environmental factors and CHD were examined, covering a wide range of risk factors. The summary random effects estimates were significant at P < 0.05 in 63 meta-analyses (38%), and 15 associations (9%) were significant at P < 10^-6. Of these meta-analyses, eventually one risk factor (severe obesity; relative risk: 1.38, 95% confidence interval: 1.30-1.47) had significant summary associations at P < 10^-6, included more than 1,000 cases, had 95% prediction intervals excluding the null value, and were not suggestive of large heterogeneity (I ² < 50%), small-study effects (P-value for Egger's test > 0.10), or excess significance (P > 0.10). Eight associations (5%) (including maternal lithium exposure, maternal obesity, maternal alcohol consumption, and maternal fever) had results that were significant at P < 10^-6, included more than 1,000 cases, and had 95% prediction intervals excluding the null value (highly suggestive). Conclusion: This umbrella review shows that many environmental factors have substantial evidence in relation to the risk of developing CHD. More and better-designed studies are needed to establish robust evidence between environmental factors and CHD. Systematic Review Registration: [PROSPERO], identifier [CRD42020193381].

Keywords: congenital heart disease; environment; epidemiology; meta-analysis; risk factor.

Publication types

Systematic Review