Aim To evaluate the effectiveness of the decision-making module in selecting an oral anticoagulant for patients with atrial fibrillation.Material and methods 638 patients with atrial fibrillation aged 68.2±4.5 years were evaluated. The CHA2DS2-VASc, HAS-BLED, and 2MАСЕ scales, the creatinine clearance calculator, and the Morisky-Green questionnaire were used.Results 311 (48.75 %) patients had paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, 138 (21.6%) had persistent atrial fibrillation, 44 (22.7%) had long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation, and 145 (22.7 %) had permanent atrial fibrillation. Mean CHADS2‑VASc scale score was 4.82; НAS-BLED scale score was 2.9; 2MACE score was 2.28; and compliance score was 3.52. 172 (26.9 %) patients were treated with rivaroxaban; 166 (26 %), with apixaban; 84 (13.2 %), with dabigatran; 210 (32.9 %), with warfarin; and 6 (1 %), with acetylsalicylic acid.Conclusion The developed decision-making module is based on scientific justification of personalized selection of the oral anticoagulant and updates the knowledge on major issues of prescription.