A survey of optimal strategy for signature-based drug repositioning and an application to liver cancer

Elife. 2022 Feb 22:11:e71880. doi: 10.7554/eLife.71880.

Abstract

Pharmacologic perturbation projects, such as Connectivity Map (CMap) and Library of Integrated Network-based Cellular Signatures (LINCS), have produced many perturbed expression data, providing enormous opportunities for computational therapeutic discovery. However, there is no consensus on which methodologies and parameters are the most optimal to conduct such analysis. Aiming to fill this gap, new benchmarking standards were developed to quantitatively evaluate drug retrieval performance. Investigations of potential factors influencing drug retrieval were conducted based on these standards. As a result, we determined an optimal approach for LINCS data-based therapeutic discovery. With this approach, homoharringtonine (HHT) was identified to be a candidate agent with potential therapeutic and preventive effects on liver cancer. The antitumor and antifibrotic activity of HHT was validated experimentally using subcutaneous xenograft tumor model and carbon tetrachloride (CCL4)-induced liver fibrosis model, demonstrating the reliability of the prediction results. In summary, our findings will not only impact the future applications of LINCS data but also offer new opportunities for therapeutic intervention of liver cancer.

Keywords: LINCS; cancer biology; connectivity map; drug prediction; homoharringtonine; human; liver cancer.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Computational Biology / methods
  • Drug Repositioning* / methods
  • Humans
  • Liver Neoplasms* / drug therapy
  • Reproducibility of Results

Associated data

  • GEO/GSE180243
  • GEO/GSE193897
  • GEO/GSE124535
  • GEO/GSE14520
  • GEO/GSE54236
  • GEO/GSE76427
  • GEO/GSE84005
  • GEO/GSE6764
  • GEO/GSE15654
  • GEO/GSE89377
  • GEO/GSE84044
  • GEO/GSE27640
  • GEO/GSE71379
  • GEO/GSE19057
  • GEO/GSE63726

Grants and funding

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.