Diagnosis of malaria in pregnancy: accuracy of CareStart™ malaria Pf/PAN against light microscopy among symptomatic pregnant women at the Central Hospital in Yaoundé, Cameroon

Malar J. 2022 Mar 9;21(1):78. doi: 10.1186/s12936-022-04109-6.

Abstract

Background: The need to start treatment early for pregnant women who present with clinical features of malaria usually conflicts with the need to confirm diagnosis by microscopy (MP) before treatment, due to delays in obtaining results. Parasite sequestration in the placenta is also a problem. Rapid diagnostic tests (RDT), which detect soluble antigens, are a valuable alternative. The objective of this study was to evaluate pretreatment parasite prevalence by microscopy and by RDT and to assess the accuracy of RDT with MP as reference.

Methods: A prospective cross-sectional study was carried out at the obstetrical unit of the Central Hospital in Yaoundé, during the period January-August 2015. Consenting patients with symptoms of suspected malaria in pregnancy were recruited and a blood sample taken for MP and RDT before treatment was started. The estimates of diagnostic performance (with 95% confidence interval) were calculated in OpenEpi online software using the Wilson's score. The agreement, as reflected by the Cohen's kappa, was calculated and interpreted using known intervals.

Results: The results showed that, out of the 104 patients recruited, 69.2% (95%CI: 59.1-77.5) were MP positive while 77.94% (95%CI: 63.1-80.9) were RDT positive. The sensitivity of the malaria RDT was 91.67% (95%CI: 83.69-96.77) while the specificity was 53.13% (95%CI: 31.39-65.57). The diagnostic accuracy of the RDT with MP as reference was 79.81% (95%CI: 70.0-86.1). All cases were due to Plasmodium falciparum. A Cohen's kappa of 0.45 (95%CI: 0.26-0.64) was obtained, consistent with a moderate agreement between the tests.

Conclusions: The diagnostic accuracy of the CareStart™ malaria Pf/PAN compared to microscopy was high, but not as desirable, with a false negative RDT at very high parasitaemia. In tertiary facilities, RDTs appear to provide a better diagnostic solution compared to microscopy. However, future studies with larger sample sizes should make this observation more generalizable; as missing a case could have serious consequences on pregnancy outcome.

Keywords: Accuracy; CareStart pf/PAN RDT; Malaria; Plasmodium falciparum; Pregnancy; Sensitivity; Yaoundé.

MeSH terms

  • Cameroon / epidemiology
  • Cross-Sectional Studies
  • Diagnostic Tests, Routine / methods
  • Female
  • Hospitals
  • Humans
  • Malaria* / diagnosis
  • Malaria, Falciparum* / diagnosis
  • Malaria, Falciparum* / epidemiology
  • Malaria, Falciparum* / parasitology
  • Microscopy / methods
  • Plasmodium falciparum
  • Pregnancy
  • Pregnant Women
  • Prospective Studies
  • Sensitivity and Specificity