Role of Ambulatory Glucose Profile in Precision Medicine in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

J Assoc Physicians India. 2022 Apr;70(4):11-12.

Abstract

Assessment of diabetes with daily blood glucose fluctuations including peaks and nadirs forms the crux of the modern management. Use of glycemic variability (GV) as a parameter to assess these fluctuations is emerging. It is important to determine the hyperglycemic and hypoglycemic episodes which are the culprits for increasing glycemic variation. Diabetes mellitus patients follow different clinical trajectories which can be traced by the ambulatory glucose profile (AGP) obtained from flash glucose monitoring system (FGMS).

Material: This comparative observational study enrolled 106 adult (>18 years) type 2 diabetes patients with HbA1c<8%. Patients were divided into two groups (group A & group B) with 53 patients each. Group A included patients on OAD's (oral antidiabetic drug) with insulin and Group B included patients on OAD's without insulin. The patients were put on FGMS for 14 days and their AGP was analysed. Hyperglycemic episodes (level 1- >180 mg/dl, level 2- >250 mg/dl) and hypoglycemic episodes (level 1- 54-70 mg/dl, level 2- <54 mg/dl) were determined between the groups.

Observation: Group A patients had significantly higher (29.99%) total number of hyperglycemic episodes (Level 1+ Level 2) as compared with group B (9.08%) (p <0.0001). Amongst group A, proportion of patients with total number of hyperglycemic episodes was significantly higher in insulin only subgroup (58.11%) followed by insulin +metformin+ 1 OAD (29.14%) & insulin+ metformin (26.82%) (p <0.0001). Amongst group B, total number of hyperglycemic episodes were found to be significantly higher with metformin only subgroup (10.19%) followed by metformin + 1 OAD (9.72%) & metformin + >1 OAD (8.1%) (p<0.0001). Amongst the add on OAD's, sulfonylurea contributed to 61.07% hyperglycemic episodes in group A & 11.63% in group B which was statistically more than DPP-4 inhibitors with 14.91% & 2.84% respectively (p <0.0001). Total number of hypoglycemic episodes seen in group A patients (8.66%) were significantly less as compared with group B (13.27%) (p<0.0001). Sulfonylurea contributed to 7.5% hypoglycemic episodes in group A & 13.2% in group B which was statistically more than DPP-4 inhibitors with 6.49% & 12.35% respectively when added to metformin (p<0.0001).

Conclusion: Amongst the OAD's used in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients in this study, total number of hyperglycemic and hypoglycemic episodes were found to be more in patients taking sulfonylurea as compared with DPP4 inhibitors when used in combination with metformin with or without insulin.

Publication types

  • Observational Study

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Blood Glucose / analysis
  • Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring
  • Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2* / drug therapy
  • Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors* / therapeutic use
  • Drug Therapy, Combination
  • Glucose
  • Glycated Hemoglobin / analysis
  • Humans
  • Hypoglycemia* / chemically induced
  • Hypoglycemic Agents / therapeutic use
  • Insulin / therapeutic use
  • Metformin* / therapeutic use
  • Precision Medicine
  • Sulfonylurea Compounds / therapeutic use

Substances

  • Blood Glucose
  • Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors
  • Glycated Hemoglobin A
  • Hypoglycemic Agents
  • Insulin
  • Sulfonylurea Compounds
  • Metformin
  • Glucose