Extreme Hinge Axis Positions Are Necessary to Achieve Posterior Tibial Slope Reduction With Small Coronal-Plane Corrections in Medial Opening Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy

Claire D Eliasberg; Kyle N Kunze; Erica Swartwout; Atul F Kamath; Hugo Robichaud; Anil S Ranawat

doi:10.1177/23259671221094346

Extreme Hinge Axis Positions Are Necessary to Achieve Posterior Tibial Slope Reduction With Small Coronal-Plane Corrections in Medial Opening Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy

Orthop J Sports Med. 2022 May 9;10(5):23259671221094346. doi: 10.1177/23259671221094346. eCollection 2022 May.

Authors

Claire D Eliasberg¹, Kyle N Kunze¹, Erica Swartwout¹, Atul F Kamath², Hugo Robichaud³, Anil S Ranawat¹

Affiliations

¹ Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA.
² Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
³ Bodycad, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada.

Abstract

Background: Both coronal- and sagittal-plane knee malalignment can increase the risk of ligamentous injuries and the progression of degenerative joint disease. High tibial osteotomy can achieve multiplanar correction, but determining the precise hinge axis position for osteotomy is technically challenging.

Purpose: To create computed tomography (CT)-based patient-specific models to identify the ideal hinge axis position angle and the amount of maximum opening in medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy (MOWHTO) required to achieve the desired multiplanar correction.

Study design: Descriptive laboratory study.

Methods: A total of 10 patients with lower extremity CT scans were included. Baseline measurements including the mechanical tibiofemoral angle (mTFA) and the posterior tibial slope (PTS) were calculated. Virtual osteotomy was performed to achieve (1) a specified degree of PTS correction and (2) a planned degree of mTFA correction. The mean hinge axis position angle for MOWHTO to maintain an anatomic PTS (no slope correction) was 102.6° ± 8.3° relative to the posterior condylar axis (PCA). Using this as the baseline correction, the resultant hinge axis position and maximum opening were then calculated for each subsequent osteotomy procedure.

Results: For 5.0° of mTFA correction, the hinge axis position was decreased by 6.8°, and the maximum opening was increased by 0.49 mm for every 1° of PTS correction. For 10.0° of mTFA correction, the hinge axis position was decreased by 5.2°, and the maximum opening was increased by 0.37 mm for every 1° of PTS correction. There was a significant difference in the trend-line slopes for hinge axis position versus PTS correction (P = .013) and a significant difference in the trend-line intercepts for maximum opening versus PTS correction (P < .0001).

Conclusion: The mean hinge axis position for slope-neutral osteotomy was 102.6° ± 8.3° relative to the PCA. For smaller corrections in the coronal plane, more extreme hinge axis positions were necessary to achieve higher magnitudes of PTS reduction.

Clinical relevance: Extreme hinge axis positions are technically challenging and can lead to unstable osteotomy. Patient-specific instrumentation may allow for precise correction to be more readily achieved.

Keywords: ACL; knee; ligament; osteotomy.