Double-lung versus heart-lung transplantation for end-stage cardiopulmonary disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Surg Today. 2023 Sep;53(9):1001-1012. doi: 10.1007/s00595-022-02579-4. Epub 2022 Sep 6.

Abstract

We compared posttransplant outcomes following double-lung transplantation (DLTx) and heart-lung transplantation (HLTx), based on a search of PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase, from inception to March 8, 2022, for studies that report outcomes of these procedures. We then performed a meta-analysis of baseline characteristics and posttransplant outcomes. Subgroup analyses were implemented according to indication, publication year, and center. This study was registered on PROSPERO (number CRD42020223493). Ten studies were included in this meta-analysis, involving 1230 DLTx patients and 1022 HLTx patients. The DLTx group was characterized by older donors (P = 0.04) and a longer allograft ischemia time (P < 0.001) than the HLTx group. The two groups had comparable 1-year, 3-year, 5-year, 10-year survival rates (all P > 0.05), with similar results identified in subgroup analyses. We found no significant differences in 1-year, 5-year, and 10-year chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD)-free survival, length of intensive care unit stay and hospital stay, length of postoperative ventilation, in-hospital mortality, or surgical complications between the groups (all P > 0.05). Thus, DLTx provides similar posttransplant survival to HLTx for end-stage cardiopulmonary disease. These two procedures have a comparable risk of CLAD and other posttransplant outcomes.

Keywords: Double-lung transplantation; Eisenmenger's syndrome; Heart–lung transplantation; Meta-analysis; Pulmonary hypertension.

Publication types

  • Meta-Analysis
  • Systematic Review
  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Heart-Lung Transplantation*
  • Humans
  • Lung
  • Lung Transplantation*
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Survival Rate
  • Tissue Donors