Multisensory visual-vestibular training improves visual heading estimation in younger and older adults

Grace A Gabriel; Laurence R Harris; Denise Y P Henriques; Maryam Pandi; Jennifer L Campos

doi:10.3389/fnagi.2022.816512

Multisensory visual-vestibular training improves visual heading estimation in younger and older adults

Front Aging Neurosci. 2022 Aug 25:14:816512. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2022.816512. eCollection 2022.

Authors

Grace A Gabriel^{1

2}, Laurence R Harris^{3

4}, Denise Y P Henriques^{4

5}, Maryam Pandi¹, Jennifer L Campos^{1

2

4}

Affiliations

¹ KITE-Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.
² Department of Psychology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
³ Department of Psychology, York University, Toronto, ON, Canada.
⁴ Centre for Vision Research, York University, Toronto, ON, Canada.
⁵ Department of Kinesiology, York University, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Abstract

Self-motion perception (e.g., when walking/driving) relies on the integration of multiple sensory cues including visual, vestibular, and proprioceptive signals. Changes in the efficacy of multisensory integration have been observed in older adults (OA), which can sometimes lead to errors in perceptual judgments and have been associated with functional declines such as increased falls risk. The objectives of this study were to determine whether passive, visual-vestibular self-motion heading perception could be improved by providing feedback during multisensory training, and whether training-related effects might be more apparent in OAs vs. younger adults (YA). We also investigated the extent to which training might transfer to improved standing-balance. OAs and YAs were passively translated and asked to judge their direction of heading relative to straight-ahead (left/right). Each participant completed three conditions: (1) vestibular-only (passive physical motion in the dark), (2) visual-only (cloud-of-dots display), and (3) bimodal (congruent vestibular and visual stimulation). Measures of heading precision and bias were obtained for each condition. Over the course of 3 days, participants were asked to make bimodal heading judgments and were provided with feedback ("correct"/"incorrect") on 900 training trials. Post-training, participants' biases, and precision in all three sensory conditions (vestibular, visual, bimodal), and their standing-balance performance, were assessed. Results demonstrated improved overall precision (i.e., reduced JNDs) in heading perception after training. Pre- vs. post-training difference scores showed that improvements in JNDs were only found in the visual-only condition. Particularly notable is that 27% of OAs initially could not discriminate their heading at all in the visual-only condition pre-training, but subsequently obtained thresholds in the visual-only condition post-training that were similar to those of the other participants. While OAs seemed to show optimal integration pre- and post-training (i.e., did not show significant differences between predicted and observed JNDs), YAs only showed optimal integration post-training. There were no significant effects of training for bimodal or vestibular-only heading estimates, nor standing-balance performance. These results indicate that it may be possible to improve unimodal (visual) heading perception using a multisensory (visual-vestibular) training paradigm. The results may also help to inform interventions targeting tasks for which effective self-motion perception is important.

Keywords: aging; bimodal perception; heading estimation; multisensory integration (MSI); postural control; self-motion; straight-ahead perception; training.