The efficacy of 18F-FDG PET/CT in monitoring disease progression in malignant pleural mesothelioma

Abstract

Objective: In the event of suspicion of malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) progression, imaging plays an important role. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT in monitoring disease progression by comparing it with CT, and estimate median overall survival (OS) according to progression status with CT and ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT.

Materials and methods: This was an observational, retrospective, single-institution study with MPM patients who had both ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT and CT for monitoring disease progression from March 2009 to February 2020. Clinical features, radiological findings, and progression status according to CT [radiologic progression negative (RPN), radiologic progression positive (RPP)] and ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT [metabolic progression negative (MPN), metabolic progression positive (MPP)] were recorded. The discrepancies and concordance between two methods were evaluated. The OS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

Results: A total of 56 patients were included. There were thirty-one (55.3%) RPN and 25 (44.7%) RPP, while there were 26 (46.5%) MPN and 30 (53.5%) MPP. All RPP patients were also found to be MPP, however, among RPN, 5 patients (8.9% of all patients) were evaluated as MPP. The concordance between two methods in monitoring disease progression was very good (K = 0.423; p < 0.01). The OS was 26 ± 2.6 months in all patients. Kaplan-Meier curves between RPN and RPP, and between MPN and MPP did not show statistically significant differences (p = 0.56 and p = 0.25, respectively).

Conclusions: Both methods are equally acceptable in monitoring disease progression in MPM, even though ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT detected more progression than CT did.

Keywords: Computed tomography; Estrategias de seguimiento; Follow-up strategies; Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM); Mesotelioma pleural maligno (MPM); PET/TC con(18)F-FDG; SUVmáx tumoral; Tomografía computarizada; Tumour SUVmax (18)F-FDG PET/CT.