Comparison of reverse shoulder arthroplasty and total shoulder arthroplasty for patients with inflammatory arthritis

Abstract

Background: End-stage glenohumeral joint arthritis is common in patients with inflammatory arthritis. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) and anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) are both indicated in this setting. RSA is often considered based on the impacts of long-standing inflammatory arthritis including glenoid and humeral bone erosion and rotator cuff insufficiency. However, acromial and scapular spine fractures following RSA have been reported more commonly in these patients, which can have a significant impact on outcomes. Currently, no study has directly compared the efficacy and complication rates of RSA vs. TSA in patients with inflammatory arthritis. This study aimed to investigate differences in clinical outcomes and complications in patients undergoing RSA vs. TSA with glenohumeral inflammatory arthritis.

Methods: We performed a retrospective review of 86 patients with inflammatory arthritis treated with primary RSA (n = 43) or TSA (n = 43) with a minimum of 2 years' follow-up. American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores, Simple Shoulder Test scores, visual analog scale scores for pain and function, active range of motion, and patient self-ratings of upper-extremity normality (Subjective Assessment of Normal Evaluation [SANE]) were collected preoperatively and at minimum 2-year follow-up. Radiographic classification of preoperative glenoid and humeral bone loss was performed, and postoperative complications were observed. Revision and complication details were compared.

Results: The study cohort had an average age of 72.1 years (range, 31-92 years) and average follow-up period of 51.6 months (range, 22-159 months). Both the RSA and TSA cohorts demonstrated improvements in patient-reported outcome measures and ranges of motion; however, patients treated with TSA showed a greater postoperative final Simple Shoulder Test score (P < .001), visual analog scale score for function (P = .0347), active elevation (P = .0331), active external rotation (P < .001), active internal rotation (P = .005), and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) score (P = .0161). Analysis of complication rates demonstrated no statistically significant difference between cohorts. Four acromial fractures occurred in the RSA group. When RSA patients who sustained acromial fractures were removed from the analysis, there were minimal differences in outcomes between the RSA and TSA cohorts.

Conclusion: TSA in patients with inflammatory arthritis leads to improved clinical outcomes but higher early revision rates when compared with RSA. RSA outcomes are negatively impacted by a high rate of postoperative acromial fractures.

Keywords: Rheumatoid arthritis; active range of motion; patient-reported outcomes; reverse shoulder arthroplasty; shoulder; total shoulder arthroplasty.