Reply to Kelman: The foundations for studying catastrophic climate risks
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
.
2022 Oct 18;119(42):e2214794119.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.2214794119.
Epub 2022 Oct 10.
Authors
Luke Kemp
1
2
,
Chi Xu
3
,
Joanna Depledge
4
,
Kristie L Ebi
5
,
Goodwin Gibbins
6
,
Timothy A Kohler
7
8
9
,
Johan Rockström
10
,
Marten Scheffer
11
,
Hans Joachim Schellnhuber
10
12
,
Will Steffen
13
,
Timothy M Lenton
14
Affiliations
1
Centre for the Study of Existential Risk, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1SB, United Kingdom.
2
Darwin College, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB3 9EU, United Kingdom.
3
School of Life Sciences, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210023, China.
4
Cambridge Centre for Environment, Energy and Natural Resource Governance, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3QZ, United Kingdom.
5
Center for Health and the Global Environment, Hans Rosling Center for Population Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195.
6
Future of Humanity Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford OX2 0DJ, United Kingdom.
7
Department of Anthropology, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164.
8
Santa Fe Institute, Santa Fe, NM 87501.
9
Cluster of Excellence ROOTS, Christian-Albrechts-Universität, 24118 Kiel, Germany.
10
Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, 14473 Potsdam, Germany.
11
Department of Environmental Sciences, University of Wageningen, 6708PB Wageningen, The Netherlands.
12
Earth System Science Department, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100190, China.
13
Fenner School of Environment and Society, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia.
14
Global Systems Institute, University of Exeter, Exeter EX4 4QE, United Kingdom.
PMID:
36215499
PMCID:
PMC9586332
DOI:
10.1073/pnas.2214794119
No abstract available
Publication types
Letter
Comment
MeSH terms
Climate*
Research*