Background: Angina with no obstructive coronary artery disease (ANOCA) is a common entity. There is still under-recognition of this condition, but it is unclear if the referral patterns for chest pain diagnosis have changed. We aimed to determine if the prevalence of patients diagnosed with ANOCA by means of coronary angiography has changed over time.
Methods: A population-based cohort of patients who had their first coronary angiogram for a chest pain syndrome in Alberta from 1995 to 2020 was extracted retrospectively from the Alberta Provincial Project for Outcome Assessment in Coronary Heart Disease (APPROACH) database. A temporal trend analysis was performed to compare patients with ANOCA vs obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD), and the predictors of ANOCA were investigated.
Results: In our analysis, 121,066 patients were included (26% ANOCA, 31% female, overall mean age 62 years). The percentages of ANOCA vs obstructive CAD ranged from 24.2% to 26.7% in all patients (P < 0.001), from 19.4% to 21.4% in patients with acute coronary syndromes (P = 0.002), and from 30.6% to 37.5% in patients with stable angina (P < 0.001). Independent predictors of ANOCA were female sex (odds ratio [OR] 3.34, 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.05-3.66), younger age (OR 0.96, 95% CI 0.95-0.96), history of atrial fibrillation (OR 2.18, 95% CI 1.73-2.73), and stable angina (vs myocardial infarction: OR 0.25, 95% CI 0.23-0.28; vs unstable angina: OR 0.79, 95% CI 0.70-0.89). Traditional cardiovascular risk factors were associated with obstructive CAD.
Conclusions: There remained a high prevalence of ANOCA detected during invasive coronary angiography, which remained stable over time. This study demonstrates an opportunity to exclude obstructive CAD with less invasive testing, particularly in women.
Copyright © 2022 Canadian Cardiovascular Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.