Post-Acute Coronary Syndrome Disparities in Guideline-Directed Lipid Therapy and Insufficient Achievement of Optimal Low-Density Lipoprotein

Abstract

Lipid-lowering therapies are an established cornerstone of secondary prevention. For patients with clinical atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, guidelines provide a class I recommendation for high-intensity statins. Furthermore, patients with low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-c) levels >70 mg/100 ml are considered at a higher risk for recurrent cardiovascular events. Previous trends in guideline-directed lipid therapy (GDLT) for secondary prevention have noted insufficiencies. In this study, we aimed to explore GDLT-prescribing patterns and assess subsequent effects on outcomes through LDL-c reduction. We used a cross-sectional study across a large, multisite university hospital system. Electronic medical records were queried for all admitted patients diagnosed with acute coronary syndrome. Data were collected for age, gender, race, and prescribed lipid medication at discharge and 1 year after discharge. Chi-square analysis was performed to assess the statistical differences in prescription rates and achieved optimal LDL-c levels. A total of 3,386 patients were studied with 2/3 of the population identified as non-Hispanic White men. Men were prescribed GDLT at a statistically significant higher rate than women, and subsequently, men were found to achieve optimal LDL-c at a statistically significant higher rate. Interestingly, Black and Hispanic patients were prescribed GDLT at the highest rates; however, these patients achieved optimal LDL-c levels at the lowest rates (significance only met for Black patients). East Indian patients achieved optimal LDL-c levels at the lowest rate among all racial groups, despite having average GDLT prescription rates. White and Asian groups achieved optimal LDL-c levels at the highest rates, with average GDLT prescription rates. Among all patients, those who achieved LDL-c levels <70 mg/100 ml were prescribed GDLT at a statistically higher rate than those who did not achieve LDL- c levels <70 mg/100 ml. We found distinct disparities in both GDLT-prescribing rates and achievement of optimal LDL-c levels for patients presenting with clinical atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Our findings may help delineate patients who should be considered at a higher risk for recurrent major adverse cardiovascular events. We also found an interesting paradox between GDLT-prescribing patterns and achievement of optimal LDL-c levels among certain racial groups. However, among all patients who achieved LDL-c levels <70 mg/100 ml, the majority were prescribed GDLT, supporting the efficacy of statins. Prescribing GDLT does not reliably achieve optimal LDL-c levels across genders and racial groups for unclear reasons. Our study adds to the growing body of knowledge assessing the complexity in secondary cardiovascular prevention.